Bug 902219 – sys-auth/nss-pam-ldapd: rekeywording

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Sam James 2023-03-20 05:36:48 UTC]

Thanks!

[addCollapseLink(1, 1, 'Toggle comment display'); Comment 1 NATTkA bot 2023-03-20 05:40:18 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)]

Sanity check failed:

> sys-auth/nss-pam-ldapd-0.9.12-r3
>   depend ~arm dev profile default/linux/arm/17.0/musl/armv6j (5 total)
>     sys-libs/musl-nscd
>   rdepend ~arm dev profile default/linux/arm/17.0/musl/armv6j (5 total)
>     sys-libs/musl-nscd

[Comment 2 Sam James 2023-12-09 23:09:00 UTC]

I feel like the dep added in

commit 090dc863c60b149b5942951fb2326472c6e70281
Author: Cristian Othón Martínez Vera <[e-mail]>
Date:   Thu Mar 16 16:42:35 2023 -0600

    sys-auth/nss-pam-ldapd: fix musl build

    * add sys-libs/musl-nscd as dependency for musl, to fix ```unknown type name nss_status_t``` error
    * patch for missing NETDB_INTERNAL

    Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/713612
    Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/716272
    Signed-off-by: Cristian Othón Martínez Vera <[e-mail]>
    Signed-off-by: Sam James <[e-mail]>

is half-bogus, half-right.

That is, I kind of feel like anyone who cares about NSS on musl (a small number) will install it anyway, which avoids the keywording hell. But then the dep isn't wrong on musl either.

Anyway, I've just masked all NSS stuff on musl for now, given it keeps leading to tinderbox bugs & confusion, and it's a hack on musl anyway.

[Comment 3 matoro 2023-12-19 05:21:50 UTC]

ppc64 done

[Comment 4 matoro 2024-01-14 04:46:48 UTC]

arm done

[Comment 5 matoro 2024-01-19 23:19:17 UTC]

ppc done

all arches done