Is this version suitable for stabilisation? Needed for imlib2 fix. (Could do 0.5.3_p20220216 if you prefer.)
> Is this version suitable for stabilisation? What are the requirement for stabilization? AFAIK it's just that the package doesn't have any outstanding bugs and has been in the tree for a while? Is that all? If so, then yes. It should be suitable for stabilization. > Could do 0.5.3_p20220216 if you prefer That was not an "official" release [0] but just a snapshot ebuild. I think it's better to stabilize the official release and skip the snapshot one. [0]: https://github.com/tats/w3m/tags
(In reply to Nickolas Raymond Kaczynski from comment #1) > > Is this version suitable for stabilisation? > > What are the requirement for stabilization? AFAIK it's just that the package > doesn't have any outstanding bugs and has been in the tree for a while? Is > that all? > > If so, then yes. It should be suitable for stabilization. > Pretty much - see https://devmanual.gentoo.org/keywording/index.html#moving-from-arch-to-arch, there's a list a bit down the page. Let's go then!
x86 done
amd64 done
arm stable
arm64 stable
ppc stable
ppc64 stable
sparc stable. Closing.