86191 – Apache 2.1 request

Bug 86191 - Apache 2.1 request

Summary: Apache 2.1 request

Status:	RESOLVED LATER

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	[OLD] Server (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	High enhancement (vote)
Assignee:	Apache Team - Bugzilla Reports

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Duplicates (1):	107380 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2005-03-21 15:06 UTC by Heikki Pernu
Modified:	2005-09-27 04:52 UTC (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Heikki Pernu 2005-03-21 15:06:58 UTC

Would it be possible to have Apache 2.1 ebuild?
It is alpha, hard masked ok.
However, mod_dav_fs_lock is only available on 2.1
(please, include the module too)

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Comment 1 Christian Parpart (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2005-03-21 16:49:40 UTC

apache2.1 has even more new exciting features.

we once had one in our previous existing svn overlay.

chipig? would you mind ...?

Comment 2 Paul Querna 2005-03-21 19:08:16 UTC

need to create the APR 1.1.* ebuilds first, and get them in.  Then we can look at importing httpd 2.1.  This also needs coordination with Subversion, since to use mod_dav_svn, Subversion must be compiled against the *SAME* APR version as httpd.  Subversion can safely use APR 1 or APR 0.9x however.... So, I am not sure how we want to do this.

Sidenote: APR 1.x can be safely SLOTed and installed at the same time sa APR 0.9x

Comment 3 Christian Parpart (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2005-04-09 17:04:08 UTC

chipig: hmm... do we have any problems in providing apr-1.1.x ebuilds? at least, where we know how to SLOT and BLOCK?

Comment 4 Michael Stewart (vericgar) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2005-09-17 18:15:31 UTC

We plan to provide ebuilds after stabilizing new-style apache settles down.

Comment 5 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2005-09-27 04:52:46 UTC

*** Bug 107380 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***