Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 780600 - [guru] app-arch/unalz-0.65 does not respect LDFLAGS
Summary: [guru] app-arch/unalz-0.65 does not respect LDFLAGS
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: GURU
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Package issues (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal
Assignee: GURU project
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: qa-guru
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2021-04-06 13:59 UTC by Agostino Sarubbo
Modified: 2021-04-25 14:01 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
build.log (build.log,6.88 KB, text/plain)
2021-04-06 13:59 UTC, Agostino Sarubbo
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2021-04-06 13:59:02 UTC
https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2020/07/04/gentoo-tinderbox/

Issue: app-arch/unalz-0.65 does not respect LDFLAGS.
Discovered on: amd64 (internal ref: guru_tinderbox)

NOTE:
To reproduce this issue you may want to set LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS} -Wl,--defsym=__gentoo_check_ldflags__=0". If this is not something about c/c++ context you may want to see this bug as an hint to hide the QA warning (with QA_FLAGS_IGNORED) where is not possible to respect LDFLAGS.
Comment 1 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2021-04-06 13:59:04 UTC
Created attachment 697965 [details]
build.log

build log and emerge --info
Comment 2 Michele Santullo 2021-04-07 11:01:38 UTC
It sounds like it's a makefile issue, if I understand correctly? Like, the bot set some LDFLAGS and the ebuild accepted them, but the build process itself discarded them, is that correct?
Comment 3 Florian Schmaus gentoo-dev 2021-04-07 11:41:26 UTC
Exactly. :)

I took the liberty and pushed https://sources.gentoo.org/repo/proj/guru.git/commit/?id=9b18dc3759829ce133604c7d097e750b37ce5720 to fix this.
Comment 4 Michele Santullo 2021-04-07 23:02:17 UTC
Thanks for fixing it! I think I was completely mistaken as my first thought was: "oh crap, I'll have to fork and either fix that crazy makefile or port it to cmake". Glad it was less complicated than all that! :)
Comment 5 Larry the Git Cow gentoo-dev 2021-04-08 10:12:03 UTC
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s):

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/proj/guru.git/commit/?id=9b18dc3759829ce133604c7d097e750b37ce5720

commit 9b18dc3759829ce133604c7d097e750b37ce5720
Author:     Florian Schmaus <flo@geekplace.eu>
AuthorDate: 2021-04-07 11:38:10 +0000
Commit:     Florian Schmaus <flo@geekplace.eu>
CommitDate: 2021-04-07 11:39:41 +0000

    app-arch/unalz: respect LDFLAGS
    
    Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/780600
    Signed-off-by: Florian Schmaus <flo@geekplace.eu>

 app-arch/unalz/{unalz-0.65.ebuild => unalz-0.65-r1.ebuild} | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Comment 6 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2021-04-25 14:01:47 UTC
Changing TRACKER as requested by QA.