77358 – Own bugzilla-section for BAS/c (www.gentoo-stats.org)

Bug 77358 - Own bugzilla-section for BAS/c (www.gentoo-stats.org)

Summary: Own bugzilla-section for BAS/c (www.gentoo-stats.org)

Status:	RESOLVED LATER

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Infrastructure
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	Bugzilla (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	High normal (vote)
Assignee:	Jeffrey Forman (RETIRED)

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2005-01-10 03:31 UTC by Alexander Mieland
Modified:	2011-10-30 23:16 UTC (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Alexander Mieland 2005-01-10 03:31:03 UTC

I'm hoping this is the right section to post this bug to.

I want to ask for an own bugzilla-section for BAS/c (www.gentoo-stats.org)

BAS/c is not an official project yet, but we are working with pvdabeel to become one. A bug section would help to make the development process more transparent to existing gentoo developers and users, allowing them to more easily 
participate in the process. 
I'm hoping to work getting gentoo-stats official by working with gentoo to meet the gentoo project standards.

So it would be very helpful if we can have our own bugsection.

I'll cc this bug to pvdabeel, because he's our maintainer.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Comment 1 Alexander Mieland 2005-01-14 03:16:36 UTC

is there someone who feels responsible for this?

Comment 2 Pieter Van den Abeele (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2005-01-18 07:45:39 UTC

Alexander, could you maintain a list of all bugs related to basc? That will make it easy to move them into their own category.

Comment 3 Alexander Mieland 2005-01-18 09:23:54 UTC

sure.
Should I post this list here then, or should I safe and modify this list locally if there are new bugs?

Comment 4 Alexander Mieland 2005-01-19 05:58:48 UTC

Well, okay, I'll post the bugs here now:
I'll continue this list locally, if there'll be new bugs...


# Very old and only about my person to get dev
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58652

# These bugs were about "gbd"
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60608
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74639

# these bugs were about "basc"
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76047
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76123
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76327
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76352
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76564
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77030
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77198
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77245
# This is the one for the own bugzilla-section
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77358
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77401
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77736
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77737
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78103
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78282
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78599

Comment 5 Alexander Mieland 2005-01-20 09:51:13 UTC

new bug for basc:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78832

Comment 6 Alexander Mieland 2005-01-23 13:33:00 UTC

two new "bugs":

http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79094
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79099

Comment 7 SpanKY gentoo-dev

2005-01-30 09:07:04 UTC

re-open once basc has become 'official'