Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 75105 - libgtk-java has new version 2.4.7.2; libglade-java now 2.8.2.2; updated java-gnome to 2.8.2-r3; ebuilds.
Summary: libgtk-java has new version 2.4.7.2; libglade-java now 2.8.2.2; updated java-...
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: x86 All
: High minor (vote)
Assignee: Thomas Matthijs (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-12-20 14:39 UTC by Andrew Cowie
Modified: 2004-12-28 16:50 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Andrew Cowie 2004-12-20 14:39:43 UTC
This is an FYI bug.

The java-gnome project has released a bug fix to the stable branch of libgtk-java, upgrading 2.4.6 to libgtk-java-2.4.7. It, however, has a mis-applied patch, and so fails to compile. 

I'm working with upstream and when we get a patch I'll back port it to a libgtk-java-2.4.7 ebuild until 2.4.7.1 (or whatever) is released.

AfC
Sydney
Comment 1 Andrew Cowie 2004-12-27 20:49:31 UTC
Updated ebuilds are at 
http://www.operationaldynamics.com/reference/software/gentoo/
specifically, 
http://www.operationaldynamics.com/reference/software/gentoo/java-gnome-2.8.2-r3_ebuilds.tar.gz

Unpack that in a Portage CVS checkout, and it should be good to go. Specific updates are libgtk-java (now 2.4.7.2 upstream), libglade-java (now 2.8.2.2 upstream), and the java-gnome meta task ebuild (my revision at java-gnome-2.8.2-r3).

The ChangeLogs should be alright. Your JNI fix of a few weeks ago is there, but I reverted the patches to specifically naming 2.4.6 as I don't want to have to copy and rename the patches for every bloody minor revision. Next major release I'll clean up the names of the enduring patches.

AfC
Sydney
Comment 2 Thomas Matthijs (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-12-28 05:07:50 UTC
commited (hope i didn't miss anything)

few realy minor notes:
had to do the jni thing in all of the them
metadata.xml follows a _very_ strict(stupid?) dtd yours weren't valid
changelog format's veren't exactly correct (echangelog can help, but i guess you need cvs access for that?)

javadoc was broken in java-gnome
Comment 3 Andrew Cowie 2004-12-28 16:50:53 UTC
Thanks Thomas. Ebuilds as committed work fine here. 

As this is a bug fix update to the 2.8 stable release branch, I want to get all five ebuilds marked x86 quickly.

AfC
Sydney