It seems we are the only ones actually (still) packaging this. It will have to go unless there is a secret python-3 port.
I'm not aware of any. Let's see if there's an answer about possible plans to update it to py3 and gtk3: https://github.com/baudm/ufw-frontends/issues/25. Otherwise… I propose to keep the package for as long as it doesn't block anything nor cause any burden.
It is blocking two trackers; so it is a burden already.
There is a reply: "Not in the near future. As of now I'm not actively maintaining this anymore. Porting to Python 3 and GTK 3 should be fairly straightforward though."
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=3397c6c8e97afdb10b0ed35c372987163e95d4c0 commit 3397c6c8e97afdb10b0ed35c372987163e95d4c0 Author: Andreas Sturmlechner <asturm@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-05-29 19:48:25 +0000 Commit: Andreas Sturmlechner <asturm@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-05-29 22:11:35 +0000 net-firewall/ufw-frontends: Remove last-rited package Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/708152 Signed-off-by: Andreas Sturmlechner <asturm@gentoo.org> net-firewall/ufw-frontends/Manifest | 1 - .../files/org.gentoo.pkexec.ufw-gtk.policy | 21 ------- .../files/ufw-frontends-0.3.2-no-log-crash.patch | 61 --------------------- net-firewall/ufw-frontends/metadata.xml | 22 -------- .../ufw-frontends/ufw-frontends-0.3.2-r5.ebuild | 64 ---------------------- profiles/package.mask | 5 -- 6 files changed, 174 deletions(-)
