603124 – sys-process/eye - process manager and monitor

Bug 603124 - sys-process/eye - process manager and monitor

Summary: sys-process/eye - process manager and monitor

Status:	UNCONFIRMED

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	Normal normal (vote)
Assignee:	Default Assignee for New Packages

URL:	https://github.com/kostya/eye
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2016-12-19 18:14 UTC by Reuben Martin
Modified:	2016-12-29 07:23 UTC (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
dev-ruby/eye-0.9.1 (eye-0.9.1.ebuild,821 bytes, text/plain) 2016-12-19 20:24 UTC, Reuben Martin	Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Reuben Martin 2016-12-19 18:14:32 UTC

Eye is a process monitoring and management framework. Seems to be quite stable, well maintained, and battle tested.

It needs to be in portage as opposed to a user-installed gem to manage the bin elements it provides (eye, leye, loader_eye)

All direct runtime dependencies (I think) are already in-tree:
dev-ruby/celluloid
dev-ruby/celluloid-io
dev-ruby/thor
dev-ruby/sigar
dev-ruby/state_machine

Reproducible: Always

Comment 1 Reuben Martin 2016-12-19 20:24:34 UTC

Created attachment 456784 [details]
dev-ruby/eye-0.9.1

Probably not be perfect, but it's a start. Seems to "work for me".

Comment 2 Reuben Martin 2016-12-25 03:21:38 UTC

apparently I was mistaken about all dependencies being it-tree:

it uses "state_machines" rather that "state_machine"

Comment 3 Hans de Graaff gentoo-dev

2016-12-29 07:23:53 UTC

Since this is an application it should not be in dev-ruby, but perhaps in sys-process? Consequently the ruby team will not be primary maintainer although we are happy to help with ruby packaging issues.