Currently, the Description field for mjc-sources is non-descript. :) It should include a better explanation of why this kernel source is different than all the other kernel sources (gentoo-sources, crypto-sources, etc.) Also, gentoo-sources and crypto-sources both have comments within the ebuild about what patches, etc have been applied to the vanilla sources. I realize mjc-sources has this info in the changelog -- someone needs to come up with the "right" place to put this information so people don't have to go searching in multiple places.
I agree completely, in fact I was just about to post a report about it. I am appreciative of mjc taking the time to generate the motherload of patches, though. However, I always say you can never have too much documentation. Actually, I wish mjc would merge the crypto stuff into his tree. I mean there really isn't much point since both trees are fairly similar, except mjc's got more feature without the crytpo stuff. Oh well, just a suggestion.
this is still yours ;-)
mjc-sources is gone for a while, I removed it and I want to have a stable, fast patchset before letting mjc-sources rear its [ugly] head again...
