sbt-0.13.11 depends on scala-2.10, but works perfectly with scala-2.11.
And also there is no such file https://dev.gentoo.org/~gienah/files/dist/sbt-0.13.11-gentoo-binary.tar.bz2
gienah, this would be a good change to make as 2.11 isn't tied to Java 7. sbt itself does seem tied to Java 7 though. :( I guess it was tested with 8? I hope to push ahead with the Java 7 removal before the end of the year so something needs to happen in this space.
(In reply to Pavel Kozlov from comment #0) > sbt-0.13.11 depends on scala-2.10, but works perfectly with scala-2.11. I do not think that sbt-0.13.11 would compile with scala-2.11. Which is why it has DEPEND=">=dev-lang-2.10.6:2.10" where the :2.10 is the slot. (In reply to Pavel Kozlov from comment #1) > And also there is no such file > https://dev.gentoo.org/~gienah/files/dist/sbt-0.13.11-gentoo-binary.tar.bz2 Thanks for reporting that, fixed. (In reply to James Le Cuirot from comment #2) > gienah, this would be a good change to make as 2.11 isn't tied to Java 7. > sbt itself does seem tied to Java 7 though. :( I guess it was tested with 8? At runtime sbt-0.13.11 seems to work with java 8. > I hope to push ahead with the Java 7 removal before the end of the year so > something needs to happen in this space. Scala upstream have a beta of scala 2.12 that depends on Java 8. And confusingly sbt upstream have a beta of sbt 1.0 that depends on scala 2.11.8: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sbt-dev/X00SU-EZQ4M sbt upstream say that sbt 1.0 will require java 8. So I'm hoping that sbt 1.0 will end up depending on scala 2.12. But like, they don't say which scala version they plan to use, even though these scala versions and which java version they are built with are binary incompatible with each other: http://eed3si9n.com/sbt-1-roadmap
Bumped to sbt-0.13.13 built with >=virtual/jdk-1.8
Fixed with the bump to dev-java/sbt-0.13.11, and also the fix is in dev-java/sbt-0.13.13
