Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 529858 - <www-client/chromium-39.0.2171.65: multiple vulnerabilities (CVE-2014-{7899,7900,7901,7902,7903,7904,7905,7906,7907,7908,7909,7910})
Summary: <www-client/chromium-39.0.2171.65: multiple vulnerabilities (CVE-2014-{7899,7...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Security
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Vulnerabilities (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal major (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Security
URL: http://googlechromereleases.blogspot....
Whiteboard: A2 [glsa]
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2014-11-19 14:25 UTC by Agostino Sarubbo
Modified: 2014-12-13 16:46 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2014-11-19 14:25:56 UTC
From ${URL} :

The Chrome team is delighted to announce the promotion of Chrome 39 to the stable channel for Windows, Mac and Linux. Chrome 39.0.2171.65 contains a number of fixes and improvements, including:
64-bit support for Mac
A number of new apps/extension APIs 
Lots of under the hood changes for stability and performance 
A partial list of changes is available in the log.

Security Fixes and Rewards

Note: Access to bug details and links may be kept restricted until a majority of users are updated with a fix. We will also retain restrictions if the bug exists in a third party library that other projects similarly depend on, but haven’t yet fixed.

This update includes 42 security fixes. Below, we highlight fixes that were either contributed by external researchers or particularly interesting. Please see the Chromium security page for more information.

[$500][389734] High CVE-2014-7899: Address bar spoofing. Credit to Eli Grey.
[$1500][406868] High CVE-2014-7900: Use-after-free in pdfium. Credit to Atte Kettunen from OUSPG.
[$1000][413375] High CVE-2014-7901: Integer overflow in pdfium. Credit to cloudfuzzer.
[$1000][414504] High CVE-2014-7902: Use-after-free in pdfium. Credit to cloudfuzzer.
[$3000][414525] High CVE-2014-7903: Buffer overflow in pdfium. Credit to cloudfuzzer.
[$2000][418161] High CVE-2014-7904: Buffer overflow in Skia. Credit to Atte Kettunen from OUSPG.
[$2000][421817] High CVE-2014-7905: Flaw allowing navigation to intents that do not have the BROWSABLE category. Credit to WangTao(neobyte) of Baidu X-Team.
[$500][423030] High CVE-2014-7906: Use-after-free in pepper plugins. Credit to Chen Zhang (demi6od) of the NSFOCUS Security Team.
[$7500][423703] High CVE-2014-0574: Double-free in Flash. Credit to biloulehibou.
[$5000][424453] High CVE-2014-7907: Use-after-free in blink. Credit to Chen Zhang (demi6od) of the NSFOCUS Security Team.
[$500][425980] High CVE-2014-7908: Integer overflow in media. Credit to Christoph Diehl.
[$500][391001] Medium CVE-2014-7909: Uninitialized memory read in Skia. Credit to miaubiz.

We would also like to thank Atte Kettunen, Christian Holler, cloudfuzzer, and mmaliszkiewicz for working with us during the development cycle to prevent security bugs from ever reaching the stable channel. $16500 in additional rewards were issued.

As usual, our ongoing internal security work was responsible for a wide range of fixes:
[433500] CVE-2014-7910: Various fixes from internal audits, fuzzing and other initiatives.



@maintainer(s): after the bump, in case we need to stabilize the package, please let us know if it is ready for the stabilization or not.
Comment 1 Mike Gilbert gentoo-dev 2014-11-20 19:03:06 UTC
Build testing now, should have an ebuild later today.
Comment 2 Mike Gilbert gentoo-dev 2014-11-20 20:51:30 UTC
chromium-39.0.2171.65 is in the tree. However, stabilization is blocked.

 www-client/chromium/chromium-39.0.2171.65.ebuild: DEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0) ['>=dev-libs/protobuf-2.5.0-r1:=']
Comment 3 Mike Gilbert gentoo-dev 2014-11-20 20:53:08 UTC
radhermit: Can we stabilize >=dev-libs/protobuf-2.5.0-r1? Do you have a preference on which version?
Comment 4 Tim Harder gentoo-dev 2014-11-21 12:44:25 UTC
(In reply to Mike Gilbert from comment #3)
> radhermit: Can we stabilize >=dev-libs/protobuf-2.5.0-r1? Do you have a
> preference on which version?

Sure, feel free to stabilize =dev-libs/protobuf-2.5.0-r1.

I don't think =dev-libs/protobuf-2.6* has had enough testing yet since it probably breaks things and is still masked due to that.
Comment 5 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2014-11-21 14:05:35 UTC
amd64/x86 stable. Cleanup done.
Comment 6 GLSAMaker/CVETool Bot gentoo-dev 2014-12-13 16:46:38 UTC
This issue was resolved and addressed in
 GLSA 201412-13 at http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201412-13.xml
by GLSA coordinator Sean Amoss (ackle).