Please remove the "selinux? ( sec-policy/selinux-* )" dependency in the DEPEND variable (not RDEPEND). Take this into account with your next package bump - if after 6 months there have been no need for other package upgrades, we will be bumping the package(s) ourselves with just this change. For more information, see our tracker Bug #527698 [1]. The requested change will be posted as a separate comment/patch. Note that if the package also depends on libselinux, libselinux itself should still remain in DEPEND and RDEPEND. [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527698 Reproducible: Always
Index: chrony-1.30-r1.ebuild =================================================================== RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/net-misc/chrony/chrony-1.30-r1.ebuild,v retrieving revision 1.1 diff -u -B -r1.1 chrony-1.30-r1.ebuild --- chrony-1.30-r1.ebuild 6 Aug 2014 09:44:31 -0000 1.1 +++ chrony-1.30-r1.ebuild 1 Nov 2014 11:33:41 -0000 @@ -14,15 +14,17 @@ KEYWORDS="amd64 ~arm hppa ~mips ppc sparc x86" IUSE="caps ipv6 +readline +rtc selinux" -RDEPEND=" +CDEPEND=" caps? ( sys-libs/libcap ) readline? ( >=sys-libs/readline-4.1-r4 ) - selinux? ( sec-policy/selinux-chronyd ) " DEPEND=" - ${RDEPEND} + ${CDEPEND} sys-apps/texinfo " +RDEPEND="${CDEPEND} + selinux? ( sec-policy/selinux-chronyd ) +" RESTRICT=test Index: chrony-1.31.ebuild =================================================================== RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/net-misc/chrony/chrony-1.31.ebuild,v retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -B -r1.6 chrony-1.31.ebuild --- chrony-1.31.ebuild 30 Oct 2014 09:55:39 -0000 1.6 +++ chrony-1.31.ebuild 1 Nov 2014 11:33:41 -0000 @@ -14,15 +14,17 @@ KEYWORDS="amd64 ~arm hppa ~mips ~ppc sparc x86" IUSE="caps ipv6 +readline +rtc selinux" -RDEPEND=" +CDEPEND=" caps? ( sys-libs/libcap ) readline? ( >=sys-libs/readline-4.1-r4 ) - selinux? ( sec-policy/selinux-chronyd ) " DEPEND=" - ${RDEPEND} + ${CDEPEND} sys-apps/texinfo " +RDEPEND="${CDEPEND} + selinux? ( sec-policy/selinux-chronyd ) +" RESTRICT=test
After checking with a few colleague developers it seems that this change does not need a revision bump after all. As such, I will make the necessary changes to the packages myself. My apologies for the noise.