Please remove the "selinux? ( sec-policy/selinux-* )" dependency in the DEPEND variable (not RDEPEND). Take this into account with your next package bump - if after 6 months there have been no need for other package upgrades, we will be bumping the package(s) ourselves with just this change. For more information, see our tracker Bug #527698 [1]. The requested change will be posted as a separate comment/patch. Note that if the package also depends on libselinux, libselinux itself should still remain in DEPEND and RDEPEND. [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527698 Reproducible: Always
Index: trousers-0.3.10-r1.ebuild =================================================================== RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/app-crypt/trousers/trousers-0.3.10-r1.ebuild,v retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -B -r1.7 trousers-0.3.10-r1.ebuild --- trousers-0.3.10-r1.ebuild 3 Aug 2014 15:17:49 -0000 1.7 +++ trousers-0.3.10-r1.ebuild 1 Nov 2014 09:33:45 -0000 @@ -20,12 +20,12 @@ # gtk support presently does NOT compile. # gtk? ( >=x11-libs/gtk+-2 ) -RDEPEND=">=dev-libs/glib-2 - >=dev-libs/openssl-0.9.7:0 - selinux? ( sec-policy/selinux-tcsd )" -DEPEND="${RDEPEND} +CDEPEND=">=dev-libs/glib-2 + >=dev-libs/openssl-0.9.7:0" +DEPEND="${CDEPEND} virtual/pkgconfig" - +RDEPEND="${CDEPEND} + selinux? ( sec-policy/selinux-tcsd )" # S="${WORKDIR}/${P}git" DOCS="AUTHORS ChangeLog NICETOHAVES README TODO"
After checking with a few colleague developers it seems that this change does not need a revision bump after all. As such, I will make the necessary changes to the packages myself. My apologies for the noise.
