Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 477326 (CVE-2013-3006) - dev-java/ibm-jdk-bin : Unspecified security fixes (CVE-2013-{3006,3007,3008,3009,3010,3011,3012,4002})
Summary: dev-java/ibm-jdk-bin : Unspecified security fixes (CVE-2013-{3006,3007,3008,3...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: CVE-2013-3006
Product: Gentoo Security
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Vulnerabilities (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Security
URL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug....
Whiteboard: B4 [noglsa cve]
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2013-07-18 19:03 UTC by Agostino Sarubbo
Modified: 2016-06-21 10:27 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2013-07-18 19:03:08 UTC
From ${URL} :

The July 2013 updates for the IBM JDK (5.0 SR16-FP3, 6 SR14, 6.0.1 SR6, 7 SR5) contain patches for 
unspecified security flaws.

For the majority of the flaws, upstream has provided a CVSSv2 base score of 9.3, which suggests a 
CVSSv2 vector of AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P. The exception is CVE-2013-4002 with a CVSSv2 base 
score of 7.1.

CVE 	        CVSSv2 Score    Fixed in
CVE-2013-3006 	9.3 		7 SR5 	 
CVE-2013-3007 	9.3 		6.0.1 SR6, 7 SR5 	 
CVE-2013-3008 	9.3 		7 SR5 	 
CVE-2013-3009 	9.3 		5.0 SR16-FP3, 6 SR14, 6.0.1 SR6, 7 SR5 	 
CVE-2013-3010 	9.3 		6.0.1 SR6, 7 SR5 	 
CVE-2013-3011 	9.3 		5.0 SR16-FP3, 6 SR14, 6.0.1 SR6, 7 SR5 	 
CVE-2013-3012 	9.3 		5.0 SR16-FP3, 6 SR14, 6.0.1 SR6, 7 SR5 	 
CVE-2013-4002 	7.1 		5.0 SR16-FP3, 6 SR14, 6.0.1 SR6, 7 SR5

References:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/jdk/alerts/
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/jdk/aix/j764/Java7_64.fixes.html#SR5
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/jdk/aix/j664/Java6_64.fixes.html#SR14
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/jdk/aix/j564/fixes.html#SR16FP3


@maintainer(s): after the bump, in case we need to stabilize the package, please say explicitly if it is ready for the stabilization or not.
Comment 1 Chris Reffett (RETIRED) gentoo-dev Security 2013-08-27 01:57:59 UTC
@java team: ping, can we get a version bump please?
Comment 2 GLSAMaker/CVETool Bot gentoo-dev 2013-08-27 02:01:17 UTC
CVE-2013-4002 (http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-4002):
  Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) in IBM Java
  5.0 before 5.0 SR16-FP3, 6 before 6 SR14, 6.0.1 before 6.0.1 SR6, and 7
  before 7 SR5 allows remote attackers to affect availability via unknown
  vectors.

CVE-2013-3012 (http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-3012):
  Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) in IBM Java
  1.4.2 before 1.4.2 SR13-FP18, 5.0 before 5.0 SR16-FP3, 6 before 6 SR14,
  6.0.1 before 6.0.1 SR6, and 7 before 7 SR5 allows remote attackers to affect
  confidentiality, availability, and integrity via unknown vectors, a
  different vulnerability than CVE-2013-3009 and CVE-2013-3011.

CVE-2013-3011 (http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-3011):
  Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) in IBM Java
  1.4.2 before 1.4.2 SR13-FP18, 5.0 before 5.0 SR16-FP3, 6 before 6 SR14,
  6.0.1 before 6.0.1 SR6, and 7 before 7 SR5 allows remote attackers to affect
  confidentiality, availability, and integrity via unknown vectors, a
  different vulnerability than CVE-2013-3009 and CVE-2013-3012.

CVE-2013-3010 (http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-3010):
  Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) in IBM Java
  6.0.1 before 6.0.1 SR6 and 7 before 7 SR5 allows remote attackers to affect
  confidentiality, availability, and integrity via unknown vectors, a
  different vulnerability than CVE-2013-3007.

CVE-2013-3009 (http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-3009):
  Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) in IBM Java
  1.4.2 before 1.4.2 SR13-FP18, 5.0 before 5.0 SR16-FP3, 6 before 6 SR14,
  6.0.1 before 6.0.1 SR6, and 7 before 7 SR5 allows remote attackers to affect
  confidentiality, availability, and integrity via unknown vectors, a
  different vulnerability than CVE-2013-3011 and CVE-2013-3012.

CVE-2013-3008 (http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-3008):
  Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) in IBM Java
  7 before 7 SR5 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality,
  availability, and integrity via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability
  than CVE-2013-3006.

CVE-2013-3007 (http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-3007):
  Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) in IBM Java
  6.0.1 before 6.0.1 SR6 and 7 before 7 SR5 allows remote attackers to affect
  confidentiality, availability, and integrity via unknown vectors, a
  different vulnerability than CVE-2013-3006.

CVE-2013-3006 (http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-3006):
  Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) in IBM Java
  7 before 7 SR5 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality,
  availability, and integrity via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability
  than CVE-2013-3008.
Comment 3 Tom Wijsman (TomWij) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-08-27 18:39:21 UTC
(In reply to Chris Reffett from comment #1)
> @java team: ping, can we get a version bump please?

Well, I tried ... but it seems upstream uploaded bin files instead of tgz for their tgz download links; when I rename the bin to tgz, it doesn't appear to work. So, I don't really know what is going on with this.

>>> Unpacking ibm-java-sdk-6.0-14.0-linux-x86_64.tgz to /var/tmp/portage/dev-java/ibm-jdk-bin-1.6.0.14/work

gzip: stdin: not in gzip format
tar: Child returned status 1
tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now
 * ERROR: dev-java/ibm-jdk-bin-1.6.0.14::gentoo failed (unpack phase):
 *   failure unpacking ibm-java-sdk-6.0-14.0-linux-x86_64.tgz

I hope someone else of the Java team will look into this; maybe I'm just missing something, maybe not and if that is the case we need to contact upstream about that. If someone can tell me which file to download instead (or rather, what to click on) then feel free to do so; I'll keep the distfiles around so that the other maintainer doesn't need to go through fetching them all again.
Comment 4 James Le Cuirot gentoo-dev 2016-04-14 20:31:51 UTC
It's been last-rited. Security team, please close this out. Java team is done here.
Comment 5 Aaron Bauman (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2016-06-21 10:27:20 UTC
GLSA Vote: No