Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 447378 - app-office/libreoffice: automatic opening of embedded external data (CVE-2012-5639)
Summary: app-office/libreoffice: automatic opening of embedded external data (CVE-2012...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 447380
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Security
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Vulnerabilities (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal minor (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Security
URL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug....
Whiteboard: B4 [upstream]
Keywords:
Depends on: CVE-2012-5639
Blocks: 447384
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2012-12-15 18:27 UTC by Agostino Sarubbo
Modified: 2016-03-23 09:54 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2012-12-15 18:27:04 UTC
From $URL :

Timo Warns (Warns@Pre-Sense.DE) reported publicly that OpenOffice and
LibreOffice (as well as other Office Suites) fail to appropriately warn users
when a file with embedded content is opened. Additionally it is not possible
to disable the opening of embedded content within files. This can be used to
add tracking behavior to files or to deliver additional files that can
potentially exploit other security issues when parsed to the user.
Additionally if the file is converted (e.g. to a PDF) and then saved the
converted file may contain a direct copy of the embedded data, thus if
something sensitive if referenced (such as ~/.ssh/id_rsa) this information may
then be exposed if the resulting file is shared.
Comment 1 Andreas K. Hüttel archtester gentoo-dev 2013-12-27 19:15:08 UTC
One year later, the CVE id is still "reserved", without providing any details. 

** RESERVED ** This candidate has been reserved by an organization or individual that will use it when announcing a new security problem. When the candidate has been publicized, the details for this candidate will be provided. 

Do we need to take this that serious?
Comment 2 Kristian Fiskerstrand (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2014-06-29 17:00:11 UTC
See https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447380 for discussion about possible fix in 4.2 series
Comment 3 Andreas K. Hüttel archtester gentoo-dev 2016-02-28 22:43:37 UTC
There's nothing that the office team can do here.

My suspicion is that if *anyone* had a clue what this bug actually meant precisely it would be fixed by now.
Comment 4 Aaron Bauman (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2016-03-07 09:19:34 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 447380 ***