Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 303135 - New ebuild request: elastic tabstops
Summary: New ebuild request: elastic tabstops
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Default Assignee for New Packages
URL: http://nickgravgaard.com/elastictabst...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-02-01 19:24 UTC by haarp
Modified: 2020-12-05 23:49 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description haarp 2010-02-01 19:24:59 UTC
There is an interesting plugin for gedit called "Elastic Tabstops" (see URL). I think it would make a nice addition to gedit-plugins. I know that gedit-plugins is actually a Gnome package, but that shouldn't stop us from adding a third party plugin, should it? Alternatively, one could make an extra package for ElTabs.
Comment 1 Peter Volkov (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-02-01 21:09:02 UTC
Looks like this should be a separate package, but I've CC'ed gedit-plugins maintainers for their opinion.
Comment 2 Romain Perier (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-02-02 12:26:41 UTC
Yup but because this is a third party plugin it's not in gedit-plugins on upstream... so why add it in gedit-plugins ? I meant we must respect what upstream decided.

This plugin looks nice and interesting, but I prefer move it in another package, as said Peter. :)
Comment 3 Romain Perier (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-02-02 12:27:43 UTC
PS: feel free to write your own ebuild, you could help us a lot ;)
Comment 4 Daniel Gryniewicz (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-02-02 12:41:39 UTC
Do we need an app-gedit category like vim has now?
Comment 5 haarp 2010-02-02 17:25:12 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> Do we need an app-gedit category like vim has now?
> 
That's the reason I initially thought it would be better to make this an useflag for gedit-plugins. But I agree that a seperate ebuild is a better idea. Creating a new category for this is overkill tbh.

(In reply to comment #3)
> PS: feel free to write your own ebuild, you could help us a lot ;)
> 
Hey, I'd love to. But the only ebuild I ever made was pretty simple (umouse) and even that one is most likely completely wrong (although it works) ;)
I could try it of course. After having a quick look at gedit-plugins, I conclude that it can't be that hard. One question: what's "G2CONF"?
Comment 6 Romain Perier (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-02-02 17:42:17 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> Do we need an app-gedit category like vim has now?
> 

there aren't plugins enough for now, imho.
However, we could have a look at third party plugins on upstream, and for each interesting plugin, we could write an ebuild and import it in app-gedit/ in portage... mhhhh... why not :)

@herd: suggestion ?

Comment 7 Daniel Gryniewicz (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-02-02 18:32:48 UTC
The real question is: does anyone on the team actually use gedit for serious work?  I'm a vimmer, so I don't use it at all, so I'd be pretty bad at maintaining any large set of plugins.

Maybe we need some serious gedit users that we can proxy maintain plugins for.
Comment 8 haarp 2010-02-19 15:41:05 UTC
Funtoo seems to handle gedit plugins by calling the packages "gedit-pluginname". I think it would be the best idea tofollow this layout, as it makes the most sense with few plugins.