Xulrunner are actually a blocker against lcms, cause it doesn't provide "lcms" use flags as other packages do. Reproducible: Always Reproducible: Always
Created attachment 189617 [details, diff] patch for net-libs/xulrunner-1.9.0.9.ebuild
What? If you don't do that it would link against included lcms, and we don't want that. There's no point on this.
(In reply to comment #0) > Xulrunner are actually a blocker against lcms, cause it doesn't provide "lcms" > use flags as other packages do. > lcms has keywords for all arches. If you specifically don't want lcms to be pulled by xulrunner, please provide a patch that makes it optional (and does not break things), since the configure flag only controls whether the internal lcms or an external lcms will be used. Closing CANTFIX.
*** Bug 267655 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
i only don't want to pull in lcms includes and library system wise, i don't mind if xulrunner use its own internal copy since it is not dirtying with lcms headers and libraries my system /usr directory. I find my patches OK, they don't break anything, they only add more choices (isnìt gentoo all about choices ? well not for you not !) Luckily i have my own gentoo-experimental overlay and i'm doing my (working) patches, if i wait you i'll get additional grey hair... Thanx a lot devs !
