25774 – development-sources thros errors when merged with FEATURES=userpriv

Bug 25774 - development-sources thros errors when merged with FEATURES=userpriv

Summary: development-sources thros errors when merged with FEATURES=userpriv

Status:	VERIFIED NEEDINFO

Alias:	None

Product:	Portage Development
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	Core - Ebuild Support (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	Normal minor (vote)
Assignee:	Portage team

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2003-08-02 13:08 UTC by Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED)
Modified:	2007-01-11 11:00 UTC (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2003-08-02 13:08:04 UTC

chown: changing ownership of `linux-2.6.0-test2/sound/oss/emu10k1/recmgr.h':
Operation not permitted
chown: changing ownership of `linux-2.6.0-test2/sound/oss/emu10k1/main.c':
Operation not permitted
chown: changing ownership of `linux-2.6.0-test2/sound/oss/emu10k1/efxmgr.h':
Operation not permitted
chown: changing ownership of `linux-2.6.0-test2/sound/oss/emu10k1/midi.c':
Operation not permitted
chown: changing ownership of `linux-2.6.0-test2/sound/oss/emu10k1/recmgr.c':
Operation not permitted
chown: changing ownership of `linux-2.6.0-test2/sound/oss/maestro.h': Operation
not permitted
chown: changing ownership of `linux-2.6.0-test2/sound/oss/dmabuf.c': Operation
not permitted
chown: changing ownership of `linux-2.6.0-test2/sound/oss/vidc.h': Operation not
permitted

This of course happens for every file.  It doesn't adversely affect anything,
but is still annoying to see all these errors run by.

Comment 1 SpanKY gentoo-dev

2003-08-02 13:15:40 UTC

nick: add the --same-owner to the tar cmd in unpack() ?

Comment 2 Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2003-10-07 03:30:48 UTC

Actually, I think adding RESTRICT=userpriv would be a better solution to
this problem.

Comment 3 Adrian Almenar 2003-10-13 06:21:45 UTC

this is strange all my 3 systems have userpriv, and i have never seen this
(i use development-sources).

wanna more info from my systems ?

Comment 4 Nicholas Jones (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2003-12-28 22:00:41 UTC

RESTRICT is never a solution. It's a workaround that isn't a good idea.

Is this still an issue?

Spanky: Did you test it with same-owner? What made you say tar?

Comment 5 Nicholas Jones (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2004-04-11 00:54:24 UTC

old.

Comment 6 Marius Mauch (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2007-01-11 11:00:47 UTC

Closing due to old age