2560 – mailman-2.0.10.ebuild (new package)

Bug 2560 - mailman-2.0.10.ebuild (new package)

Summary: mailman-2.0.10.ebuild (new package)

Status:	RESOLVED FIXED

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware:	x86 Linux

Importance:	High enhancement (vote)
Assignee:	Ben Lutgens (RETIRED)

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2002-05-07 19:56 UTC by Joby Walker
Modified:	2003-02-04 19:42 UTC (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
Tar.gz with mailman ebuild files (mailman.tar.gz,1.86 KB, application/x-gzip) 2002-05-07 19:58 UTC, Joby Walker	Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Joby Walker 2002-05-07 19:56:23 UTC

Attached is mailman.tar.gz, which contains:
mailman-2.0.10.ebuild -- the ebuild for mailman 2.0.10
files/README -- Explanatory info with some install help
files/mailman.conf -- file for inclusion in apache config files
files/digest-mailman-2.0.10

Mailman is an excellent email list manager with an integrated web administrative
and archive element.  Mailman is used by the gentoo email lists.  I suggest that
it goes in net-mail/mailman, and it is dependant on >=python-1.5.2, virtual/mta,
net-www/apache.

Feel free to contact me on any questions, comments, criticism.  This is my first
submitted ebuild.

jbw

Comment 1 Joby Walker 2002-05-07 19:58:15 UTC

Created attachment 888 [details]
Tar.gz with mailman ebuild files

Comment 2 Joby Walker 2002-06-20 12:39:17 UTC

I noticed that the ebuild is being passed around.  Just curious about the
current status, because I have an updated version for mailman-2.0.11 which has a
couple bug fixes.  I would like to get the mailman ebuild to the newest version,
but I don't want to delay it's release.

jbw -- zorloc@imperium.org

Comment 3 Ben Lutgens (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2002-07-16 22:35:15 UTC

 i took what you had here, modified it slightly, updated to 2.0.12 and 
committed it masked. Nice work on that package and THANK YOU! 
 
Sorry it did get passed around alot, we had some major changes happening here.