I'm filing this bug (from a template, mind you) because the ebuild I'm reporting it against failed to build once I removed my /usr/bin/{gcc,cc,c++,c99} binaries. This means that the ebuild is relying on gcc or cc as compiler, while it should use "$(tc-getCC)" so that user choices are respected, and cross-compiling works as intended. This usually comes down to one of these tasks: - use emake CC="$(tc-getCC)" for building, to ovewrite make's CC variable (defaults to "cc", some upstream rewrites it); - the above plus replacing explicit "gcc" (or similar) calls with $(CC) so that the variable is actually respected; - tc-export CC in src_compile before eventual econf. For C++, you'd have to replace CC with CXX everywhere above, of course. If your package is a special case on this, please let me know. Thanks, Diego
Created attachment 392274 [details, diff] tigcc-0.96_beta8-ebuild.patch Proposed fix as patch to tigcc-0.96_beta8.ebuild Fixes some other small QA issues
+*tigcc-0.96_beta8-r1 (25 Dec 2014) + + 25 Dec 2014; Sergey Popov <pinkbyte@gentoo.org> -tigcc-0.96_beta8.ebuild, + +tigcc-0.96_beta8-r1.ebuild: + Revision bump: respect AR, CC and RANLIB, wrt bug #243866. Bump EAPI and fix + some QA issues, wrt bug #438218. Acked by Mikle Kolyada. Drop old revision
