Bug 192239 – New ebuild for gtkimageview library

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Bruce Guenter 2007-09-11 21:36:02 UTC]

GtkImageView is a simple image viewer widget for GTK. Similar to the image viewer panes in gThumb or Eye of Gnome. It makes writing image viewing and editing applications easy.

Its home page is http://trac.bjourne.webfactional.com/

Reproducible: Always

[Comment 1 Bruce Guenter 2007-09-11 21:36:46 UTC]

Created attachment 130639 [details]
New ebuild for GtkImageView-1.5.0

[Comment 2 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2007-09-11 21:40:31 UTC]

*** Bug 52445 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Comment 3 Wolfgang Goetz 2007-12-27 12:20:18 UTC]

Created attachment 139394 [details, diff]
License is LGPL-3 

http://trac.bjourne.webfactional.com/chrome/common/gtkimageview-docs/overview.html
links to http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html which is V3 of the LGPL

[Comment 4 Wolfgang Goetz 2007-12-27 12:25:47 UTC]

is ist possible to tell ebuild that SRC_URI with '?format=raw'
should place the tar.gz solely?

now it's: /usr/portage/distfiles/gtkimageview-1.5.0.tar.gz?format=raw

[Comment 5 Wolfgang Goetz 2007-12-27 12:27:15 UTC]

to see it working: emerge ufraw 

[Comment 6 Wolfgang Goetz 2007-12-27 12:40:44 UTC]

Created attachment 139396 [details, diff]
LGPL-3 and ~amd64

[Comment 7 Andreas Volz 2008-03-29 16:00:19 UTC]

Created attachment 147633 [details]
New Ebuild for gtkimageview-1.6.1

Updated to 1.6.1

I think renaming the file after download and then using the ebuild way to unpack is better than tar direct.

[Comment 8 Dmitry Ivankov 2009-01-18 22:20:57 UTC]

> I think renaming the file after download and then using the ebuild way to
> unpack is better than tar direct.
No, this way file will be fetched again each time.
Filename issue ticket http://trac.bjourne.webfactional.com/ticket/27

[Comment 9 Ian Stakenvicius (RETIRED) 2009-03-09 23:23:34 UTC]

Created attachment 184513 [details]
new ebuild for gtkimageview

I version-bumped this ebuild to current upstream, and converted it to EAPI="2", which cleans up the ebuild substantially and addresses the pesky ?format=raw filename issue.

Tried submitting it to sunrise, but they want the docs to be strippable via USE="-doc", a patch to configure.in/Makefile.am and eautoreconf, before they will accept.

[Comment 10 MT 2009-06-02 16:34:57 UTC]

Created attachment 193307 [details]
x11-libs/gtkimageview-1.6.3.ebuild

- fixed ebuild headers;
- fixed USE="doc" as required by sunrise project;
- added missing eauto* calls;
- improved ebuild to make usage of the gnome2 eclass;

p.s.: unfortunately compilation with USE="doc" fails due a parsing error (just reported upstream as bugreport: http://trac.bjourne.webfactional.com/ticket/36 ), so i suggest to temporarely mask the use 'doc' within the profile of the sunrise overlay until the bug is fixed.

[Comment 11 MT 2009-06-02 16:39:43 UTC]

Created attachment 193309 [details]
x11-libs/gtkimageview-1.6.4.ebuild

version bump for v1.6.4

p.s.: this version do not compile at all, see my upstrem report: http://trac.bjourne.webfactional.com/ticket/35

[Comment 12 Mounir Lamouri (volkmar) (RETIRED) 2009-06-02 17:37:10 UTC]

It looks like maekke added a gtkimageview ebuild to the tree yesterday.