Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 112290 - net-proxy/privoxy-3.0.3.2 (pointless version bump)
Summary: net-proxy/privoxy-3.0.3.2 (pointless version bump)
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High trivial (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Network Proxy Developers (OBSOLETE)
URL: http://www.privoxy.org/
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-11-12 09:55 UTC by Paul Bredbury
Modified: 2005-11-13 12:13 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
Diff from 3.0.3 to 3.0.3.2 (diff.txt,9.43 KB, text/plain)
2005-11-12 09:57 UTC, Paul Bredbury
Details
privoxy-3.0.3.2.diff (privoxy-ebuilds.diff,1.38 KB, patch)
2005-11-12 10:00 UTC, Paul Bredbury
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Paul Bredbury 2005-11-12 09:55:20 UTC
This was triggered by bug #112260

http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=11118&package_id=10571
shows  that the latest version released is 3.0.3.2, whereas the latest version
in portage is 3.0.3-r3. However, the differences between the two released
versions are trivial, and probably do not even deserve a version bump. The
differences are:

1. Cleanup of autom4te.cache/, which the current ebuild cleans anyway
2. Moved cgi_error_disabled() from cgiedit.c to cgi.c, to re-enable build with
--disable-editor (which the Gentoo ebuild does not care about)
Comment 1 Paul Bredbury 2005-11-12 09:57:45 UTC
Created attachment 72761 [details]
Diff from 3.0.3 to 3.0.3.2

This shows the difference in the released versions. Executed as:
diff -u -r 303/privoxy-3.0.3-stable/ 303-2/privoxy-3.0.3-stable/ > diff.txt
Comment 2 Paul Bredbury 2005-11-12 10:00:29 UTC
Created attachment 72762 [details, diff]
privoxy-3.0.3.2.diff

Ebuild patch, if the version bump is considered worthwhile.
Comment 3 Alin Năstac (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-11-13 12:13:48 UTC
nah, not worth the trouble. we will wait for the next 3-digit version.

thanks for the analysis though ;)