Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 1091 - incorporating some of gentoolkit
Summary: incorporating some of gentoolkit
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Portage Development
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Unclassified (show other bugs)
Hardware: x86 Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Karl Trygve Kalleberg (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-03-12 09:34 UTC by Grant Goodyear (RETIRED)
Modified: 2011-10-30 22:21 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Grant Goodyear (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-03-12 09:34:38 UTC
Drobbins has suggested that it's time to incorporate some of the more
stable/useful tools into portage proper.  As a first step, I would
suggest moving etc-update, lintool, and qpkg into the portage
bin directory.  To make these tools really useful, though, I think they
need manpages (at least simple ones) _and_ they should be mentioned 
in some of our docs (presumably the Portage user's guide and, for lintool,
the dev doc).
Comment 1 Karl Trygve Kalleberg (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-03-16 11:32:29 UTC
Added man pages. 
Comment 2 Paul Belt 2002-07-25 10:55:58 UTC
We should change gentoolkit's description to state it's a place-holder for tools
to go into portage.
Comment 3 Karl Trygve Kalleberg (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-07-28 21:42:43 UTC
That is explained on the package's home page. Furthermore, only pkgsearch has
ever actually migrated from gentoolkit into Portage proper.

If the Gentoolkit tools should migrate into Portage, they should use the Portage
DB API instead of parsing the directories themselves. The DB API won't be ready
for a few months, yet, so I'm closing this bug, as we want to open a separate
bug for each tool that is eligible for inclusion later on.