From $URL: Forthcoming OpenSSL releases ============================ The OpenSSL project team would like to announce the forthcoming release of OpenSSL versions 1.0.2f, 1.0.1r. These releases will be made available on 28th January between approx. 1pm and 5pm (UTC). They will fix two security defects, one of "high" severity affecting 1.0.2 releases, and one "low" severity affecting all releases. Please see the following page for further details of severity levels: https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html Please also note that, as per our previous announcements, support for 1.0.0 and 0.9.8 releases ended on 31st December 2015 and are no longer receiving security updates. Support for 1.0.1 will end on 31st December 2016. Yours
Advisory has been requested and Lars agreed to commit updated packages at release time.
I.e. the new releases are out.
(In reply to Jeroen Roovers from comment #2) > I.e. the new releases are out. Summary isn't to be changed before stable candidates are in the gentoo tree.
OpenSSL Security Advisory [28th Jan 2016] ========================================= NOTE: SUPPORT FOR VERSION 1.0.1 WILL BE ENDING ON 31ST DECEMBER 2016. NO SECURITY FIXES WILL BE PROVIDED AFTER THAT DATE. UNTIL THAT TIME SECURITY FIXES ONLY ARE BEING APPLIED. DH small subgroups (CVE-2016-0701) ================================== Severity: High Historically OpenSSL usually only ever generated DH parameters based on "safe" primes. More recently (in version 1.0.2) support was provided for generating X9.42 style parameter files such as those required for RFC 5114 support. The primes used in such files may not be "safe". Where an application is using DH configured with parameters based on primes that are not "safe" then an attacker could use this fact to find a peer's private DH exponent. This attack requires that the attacker complete multiple handshakes in which the peer uses the same private DH exponent. For example this could be used to discover a TLS server's private DH exponent if it's reusing the private DH exponent or it's using a static DH ciphersuite. OpenSSL provides the option SSL_OP_SINGLE_DH_USE for ephemeral DH (DHE) in TLS. It is not on by default. If the option is not set then the server reuses the same private DH exponent for the life of the server process and would be vulnerable to this attack. It is believed that many popular applications do set this option and would therefore not be at risk. OpenSSL before 1.0.2f will reuse the key if: - SSL_CTX_set_tmp_dh()/SSL_set_tmp_dh() is used and SSL_OP_SINGLE_DH_USE is not set. - SSL_CTX_set_tmp_dh_callback()/SSL_set_tmp_dh_callback() is used, and both the parameters and the key are set and SSL_OP_SINGLE_DH_USE is not used. This is an undocumted feature and parameter files don't contain the key. - Static DH ciphersuites are used. The key is part of the certificate and so it will always reuse it. This is only supported in 1.0.2. It will not reuse the key for DHE ciphers suites if: - SSL_OP_SINGLE_DH_USE is set - SSL_CTX_set_tmp_dh_callback()/SSL_set_tmp_dh_callback() is used and the callback does not provide the key, only the parameters. The callback is almost always used like this. Non-safe primes are generated by OpenSSL when using: - genpkey with the dh_rfc5114 option. This will write an X9.42 style file including the prime-order subgroup size "q". This is supported since the 1.0.2 version. Older versions can't read files generated in this way. - dhparam with the -dsaparam option. This has always been documented as requiring the single use. The fix for this issue adds an additional check where a "q" parameter is available (as is the case in X9.42 based parameters). This detects the only known attack, and is the only possible defense for static DH ciphersuites. This could have some performance impact. Additionally the SSL_OP_SINGLE_DH_USE option has been switched on by default and cannot be disabled. This could have some performance impact. This issue affects OpenSSL version 1.0.2. OpenSSL 1.0.2 users should upgrade to 1.0.2f OpenSSL 1.0.1 is not affected by this CVE because it does not support X9.42 based parameters. It is possible to generate parameters using non "safe" primes, but this option has always been documented as requiring single use and is not the default or believed to be common. However, as a precaution, the SSL_OP_SINGLE_DH_USE change has also been backported to 1.0.1r. This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 12 January 2016 by Antonio Sanso (Adobe). The fix was developed by Matt Caswell of the OpenSSL development team (incorporating some work originally written by Stephen Henson of the OpenSSL core team). SSLv2 doesn't block disabled ciphers (CVE-2015-3197) ==================================================== Severity: Low A malicious client can negotiate SSLv2 ciphers that have been disabled on the server and complete SSLv2 handshakes even if all SSLv2 ciphers have been disabled, provided that the SSLv2 protocol was not also disabled via SSL_OP_NO_SSLv2. This issue affects OpenSSL versions 1.0.2 and 1.0.1. OpenSSL 1.0.2 users should upgrade to 1.0.2f OpenSSL 1.0.1 users should upgrade to 1.0.1r This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 26th December 2015 by Nimrod Aviram and Sebastian Schinzel. The fix was developed by Nimrod Aviram with further development by Viktor Dukhovni of the OpenSSL development team. An update on DHE man-in-the-middle protection (Logjam) ==================================================================== A previously published vulnerability in the TLS protocol allows a man-in-the-middle attacker to downgrade vulnerable TLS connections using ephemeral Diffie-Hellman key exchange to 512-bit export-grade cryptography. This vulnerability is known as Logjam (CVE-2015-4000). OpenSSL added Logjam mitigation for TLS clients by rejecting handshakes with DH parameters shorter than 768 bits in releases 1.0.2b and 1.0.1n. This limit has been increased to 1024 bits in this release, to offer stronger cryptographic assurance for all TLS connections using ephemeral Diffie-Hellman key exchange. OpenSSL 1.0.2 users should upgrade to 1.0.2f OpenSSL 1.0.1 users should upgrade to 1.0.1r The fix was developed by Kurt Roeckx of the OpenSSL development team. Note ==== As per our previous announcements and our Release Strategy (https://www.openssl.org/policies/releasestrat.html), support for OpenSSL version 1.0.1 will cease on 31st December 2016. No security updates for that version will be provided after that date. Users of 1.0.1 are advised to upgrade. Support for versions 0.9.8 and 1.0.0 ended on 31st December 2015. Those versions are no longer receiving security updates. References ========== URL for this Security Advisory: https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160128.txt Note: the online version of the advisory may be updated with additional details over time. For details of OpenSSL severity classifications please see: https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html
commit 8cc70f2b5cd0e33c1c5cb25dafd6be28c71cc7d7 Author: Lars Wendler <polynomial-c@gentoo.org> Date: Fri Jan 29 07:54:06 2016 dev-libs/openssl: Security bump to versions 1.0.1r and 1.0.2f (bug #572854). Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27 Signed-off-by: Lars Wendler <polynomial-c@gentoo.org> Sorry for the delay guys. Arches please test and mark stable =dev-libs/openssl-1.0.1r and =dev-libs/openssl-1.0.2f with target KEYWORDS: alpha amd64 arm arm64 hppa ia64 m68k ~mips ppc ppc64 s390 sh sparc x86
dev-libs/openssl: stable for alpha/amd64/arm/ia64/ppc/ppc64/s390/sh/sparc/x86 wrt security bug #572854
This issue was resolved and addressed in GLSA 201601-05 at https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201601-05 by GLSA coordinator Tobias Heinlein (keytoaster).
Reopening for hppa.
Stable for HPPA.
The GLSA does not mark 1.0.1r as not-affected. Can we update that?
(In reply to Christian Theune from comment #10) > The GLSA does not mark 1.0.1r as not-affected. Can we update that? Fixed
Hi Could anybody look my bug 573916 ? It seems updated OpenSSL 1.0.2f have issue with dev-perl/IO-Socket-SSL<2.23 I have troubles with postfix/dkimproxy on stable x86 gentoo with 1.0.2f