Home | Docs | Forums | Lists | Bugs | Planet | Store | GMN | Get Gentoo!
Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.
View Bug Activity | Format For Printing | XML | Clone This Bug
I cleaned up the ebuild for games-server/monopd-0.9.3 and put some extra checks in it. Can this enter portage as games-server/monopd-0.9.3-r1 ? Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1 cd /usr/portage/games-server/monopd/ 2 cp monopd-0.9.3.ebuild monopd-0.9.3-r1.ebuild 3 patch monopd-0.9.3-r1.ebuild monopd-newebuild.patch 4 ebuild monopd-0.9.3-r1.ebuild digest Actual Results: The new ebuild will be in /usr/portage/games-server/monopd/monopd-0.9.3-r1.ebuild
Created an attachment (id=63212) [details] The patch to make the new ebuild from monopd-0.9.3.ebuild Apply this patch with the 4 steps that I described
Created an attachment (id=63218) [details] The patch to make the new ebuild from monopd-0.9.3.ebuild New version of the patch (1st version misses a backslash)
what bug does this fix? So far, I don't see any reason to make this change.
(In reply to comment #3) > what bug does this fix? So far, I don't see any reason to make this change. None. It just cleans the code in the ebuild and adds some extra checks.
ok, it uses doinitd now. This isn't really the kind of thing we rev bump for, nor is it really the kind of thing I'm looking for bug reports on, by the way. The use of doinitd doesn't change the package that is installed at all. If you'd like to help improve the state of games on Gentoo, consider instead looking at open bugs and attaching fixes for those rather than opening bugs for packages that are working just fine. Thanks.