First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 94906
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: ppc64 architecture team <ppc64@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Chris L. Mason <clmason@gmail.com>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
ibm-jre-bin.strace ibm-jre-bin.strace application/octet-stream Omkhar Arasaratnam (RETIRED) 2005-06-12 17:21 0000 187.74 KB Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 94906 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 94906 blocks: 93807 113192
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2005-06-03 03:36 0000
It seems like ibm-jre-bin and ibm-jdk-bin are no longer working
on ppc64.  I have an up-to-date ppc64 system, running kernel
2.6.12-rc5.  When I try running java I get:

$ java -version
JVMDG218: JVM is not fully initialized - will not do dump processing.
Segmentation fault

I think this was the only java available for ppc64. :(

Maybe someone could check with IBM on this and see if they have a
newer version?

Thanks.

------- Comment #1 From Jan Brinkmann (RETIRED) 2005-06-12 06:05:08 0000 -------
Assigning to you guys since nobody from the java team has access to a ppc64
machine. Please advise.

------- Comment #2 From Omkhar Arasaratnam (RETIRED) 2005-06-12 17:18:42 0000 -------
happens with 2.6.11-r9 as well, please find the strace attached.

------- Comment #3 From Omkhar Arasaratnam (RETIRED) 2005-06-12 17:21:56 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=61129) [details]
ibm-jre-bin.strace

strace of running java -version

------- Comment #4 From Omkhar Arasaratnam (RETIRED) 2005-06-13 10:40:18 0000 -------
Coworkers on the JRE team have suggested that we're running an old version -
will try with sr1a

------- Comment #5 From Omkhar Arasaratnam (RETIRED) 2005-06-13 12:45:25 0000 -------
sr1a fails too - will see if it fails when sr2 releases

------- Comment #6 From Markus Rothe 2005-06-15 03:19:21 0000 -------
This problem is very odd. :-/ 
 
$ java -version 
JVMDG218: JVM is not fully initialized - will not do dump processing. 
Segmentation fault 
$ JAVA_COMPILER=none java -version 
Warning: JIT compiler "none" not found. Will use interpreter. 
java version "1.4.2" 
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2) 
Classic VM (build 1.4.2, J2RE 1.4.2 IBM build cxp641420-20040626 (JIT 
disabled)) 

------- Comment #7 From Omkhar Arasaratnam (RETIRED) 2005-06-15 06:13:24 0000 -------
Raised a PMR with the JRE team.

------- Comment #8 From Omkhar Arasaratnam (RETIRED) 2005-06-15 06:33:39 0000 -------
Chris can you do an emerge --info pls?

------- Comment #9 From Chris L. Mason 2005-06-15 07:03:59 0000 -------
 
Sure, here's the info: 
 
Gentoo Base System version 1.6.12 
Portage 2.0.51.22-r1 (default-linux/ppc64/2004.3, gcc-3.4.3-20050110, 
glibc-2.3.5-r0, 2.6.12-rc5 ppc64) 
================================================================= 
System uname: 2.6.12-rc5 ppc64 PPC970FX, altivec supported 
ccache version 2.4 [enabled] 
dev-lang/python:     2.3.5 
sys-apps/sandbox:    1.2.8 
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.13, 2.59-r6 
sys-devel/automake:  1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.5 
sys-devel/binutils:  2.16-r1 
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.18 
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.11-r1 
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="ppc64 ~ppc64" 
AUTOCLEAN="yes" 
CBUILD="powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu" 
CFLAGS="-O3 -mtune=970 -maltivec -mabi=altivec -pipe" 
CHOST="powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu" 
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3.4/env /usr/kde/3.4/share/config /usr/kde/3.4/shutdown /usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/lib/X11/xkb /usr/lib/mozilla/defaults/pref /usr/share/config /var/qmail/control" 
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d" 
CXXFLAGS="-O3 -mtune=970 -maltivec -mabi=altivec -pipe" 
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles" 
FEATURES="autoconfig ccache distlocks sandbox sfperms strict" 
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://distfiles.gentoo.org 
http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/gentoo" 
MAKEOPTS="-j1" 
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages" 
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp" 
PORTDIR="/usr/portage" 
SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage" 
USE="ppc64 X a52 aac alsa altivec berkdb bitmap-fonts bzip2 cdr crypt cups curl 
dv dvdr encode fam fbcon font-server fortran gdbm gif gpm gtk gtk2 imap jpeg 
kdeenablefinal lzo mad matroska mbox mjpeg mng motif mozilla mpeg ncurses nodrm 
ogg opengl perl png python qt readline sdl ssl svg theora tiff truetype 
truetype-fonts type1-fonts unicode vorbis xml2 xprint xvid zlib userland_GNU 
kernel_linux elibc_glibc" 
Unset:  ASFLAGS, CTARGET, LANG, LC_ALL, LDFLAGS, LINGUAS, PORTDIR_OVERLAY 
 

------- Comment #10 From Omkhar Arasaratnam (RETIRED) 2005-06-16 06:37:44 0000 -------
Test box access granted to JRE dev team

------- Comment #11 From Petteri Räty 2005-07-15 00:06:51 0000 -------
*** Bug 98946 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #12 From Yang Dehua 2005-07-15 00:19:23 0000 -------
I tried the new IBM sr2 version, but it had the same problem. The problem seems
to have someting to do with jit compiler, there is no problem to run java
programs when jit is disabled in my system(2.6.12-r4).

------- Comment #13 From Yang Dehua 2005-08-09 17:45:35 0000 -------
Any progress in this regard?

------- Comment #14 From Omkhar Arasaratnam (RETIRED) 2005-08-10 06:14:23 0000 -------
Sadly it seems the JIT compiler team isn't responding anymore.

For now, the workaround seems to be to disable the JIT.

------- Comment #15 From Brent Baude 2005-08-30 06:20:31 0000 -------
This can be done with set/export JAVA_COMPILER=NONE or adding
-Djava.compiler=NONE to your java command.

------- Comment #16 From Markus Rothe 2005-10-06 23:23:17 0000 -------
IBM Java5 betas are out:

http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/java/jdk/java5beta/

I think it is a good idea to test them, isn't it?

------- Comment #17 From Yang Dehua 2005-10-07 02:17:42 0000 -------
Yes, I just tried IBM java5 beta, and it worked with jit enabled. I also ran
some apps 
including eclipse 3.1.1, jboss 4.0.2, and azureus, all of them worked well. i
noticed that 
this beta java5 was much faster than v1.4.2 under my system. 

------- Comment #18 From Markus Rothe 2006-02-01 10:30:23 0000 -------
ibm-jdk-bin-1.5.0 is in portage now. it is still hard masked but ~ppc64, so I
guess I can close this bug. That version will go stable as normal (4 weeks out
of p.masked and no bugs during this period). If anybody wants this still being
open, then please reopen.

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug