Bug 91654 – sys-devel/gdb heap overflow

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Security

[Description Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen (RETIRED) 2005-05-05 22:59:58 UTC]

See bug #91398 for details (comment #11).

[Comment 1 Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen (RETIRED) 2005-05-05 23:02:18 UTC]

Arhces please test and mark gdb-6.3-r3 stable.

[Comment 2 Michael Hanselmann (hansmi) (RETIRED) 2005-05-06 00:37:10 UTC]

Stable on ppc.

[Comment 3 Michael Hanselmann (hansmi) (RETIRED) 2005-05-06 02:32:29 UTC]

Stable on hppa.

[Comment 4 Markus Rothe (RETIRED) 2005-05-06 06:33:56 UTC]

stable on ppc64

[Comment 5 Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) 2005-05-06 08:52:04 UTC]

sparc stable.

[Comment 6 solar (RETIRED) 2005-05-06 09:27:33 UTC]

I had todo a small touchups for mips and uclibc.
(mips may desire more readline fixes from the readline-[4-5].x patchsets)

[Comment 7 Bryan Østergaard (RETIRED) 2005-05-06 12:21:43 UTC]

Stable on alpha.

[Comment 8 Olivier Crete (RETIRED) 2005-05-06 14:02:41 UTC]

x86 and amd64 done

[Comment 9 solar (RETIRED) 2005-05-09 08:13:02 UTC]

There is going to be another round of gdb patching then stble markings. all the bfd problems have not been fixed yet.

[Comment 10 Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen (RETIRED) 2005-05-14 03:07:10 UTC]

Should we wait with a GLSA announcement until then?

[Comment 11 Thierry Carrez (RETIRED) 2005-05-15 08:51:34 UTC]

<taviso> Koon: they're QA issues, not security issues though..just crashes, they shouldnt block the glsa (unless i missed something)
<Koon> taviso: regressions ?
<taviso> Koon: nope, no worse of than previous version except the security fix is in

This is GLSA-ready then

[Comment 12 Thierry Carrez (RETIRED) 2005-05-20 07:35:48 UTC]

GLSA 200505-15