Bugzilla Bug 81248

Please update the ebuild to 1.51. All that needs to be done is renaming it.
Thanks.

I'll submit the ebuild renamed on this bug as soon as i get home and access to
my PC...

Created an attachment (id=50783) [details]
new ebuild

Where are the ebuilds for nwn-hotu and nwn-sou?

nwn-cep depeonds soly on unrar. Why do I need unrar if I have rar installed? It
should therefor depend on either unrar OR rar.

As a matter of fact the latest version of CEP is 1.52

Created an attachment (id=68971) [details]
ebuild for 1.52

this is an ebuild for version 1.52. All i've changed is adding an '_' after the
version number, and switching from rar to zip, as i got:
ceptexture.hak	     - CRC failed
when trying with the rar version ....

comments:

no need for src_unpack() ?
don't mv, but cp in src_install()

nice job @ the rest.

Created an attachment (id=68984) [details]
revisited ebuild

Ok, this is the same without src_unpack and cp instead mv ...

Please read:

http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm/docs/mw-faq/keywords.txt
http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm/docs/mw-faq/quoting.txt

Created an attachment (id=70168) [details]
Improved ebuild with sou and hou use flags

Fixes per Comment #8:
-Added double quotes around ${WORKDIR}
-Fixed KEYWORDS

Improvements:
-Added "hou sou" to IUSE
-Made hak selection check for use flags instead of non-existant packages
-Removed $cep
-Removed installation of unused hak files to cep/

See Bug #106789 for information on the new use flags.  Since the new NWN ebuild
(1.66-r1) is hard masked, this one should probably be hard masked along with
it.

What was the deal with checking for games-rpg/nwn-hotu and games-rpg/nwn-sou? 
They don't exist right now, and by the looks of bug 106789, Chris Gianelloni
wasn't planning on taking that route.

Also, I removed $cep and the related cp because I could think of no good reason
for the unused hak files to be installed to the cep/ directory.

Created an attachment (id=70170) [details]
Improved ebuild without extra quotes

<Mr_Bones_> kccricket: no quotes on variable initialization.
<Mr_Bones_> S="..." <- quotes not needed there.

Well, nwn-hotu/nwn-sou couldn't be added due to policy that forbids more than
one ebuild providing the same file, and it requires the removal of files for the
patches to work correctly.  I'll get to this some time soon, but my time is very
limited at the moment, especially wrt games bugs.

(In reply to comment #3)
> nwn-cep depeonds soly on unrar. Why do I need unrar if I have rar installed? It
> should therefor depend on either unrar OR rar.

I don't think this should be an issue if I get
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110387 through.

unrar is open source and thus this one should always be installed when I want
unrar+ functionallity. When installing rar that should in it's place depend on
the OSS unrar version. In that case, we can use unrar no matter what.

(In reply to comment #12)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > nwn-cep depeonds soly on unrar. Why do I need unrar if I have rar installed? It
> > should therefor depend on either unrar OR rar.
> 
> I don't think this should be an issue if I get
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110387 through.
> 
> unrar is open source and thus this one should always be installed when I want
> unrar+ functionallity. When installing rar that should in it's place depend on
> the OSS unrar version. In that case, we can use unrar no matter what.

Guess that post was quite useless since we now use zip files. May I ask why? I
know bandwith nowadays seems to be plenty off, as harddisk space, but the rar is
80mb smaller. That's a THIRD! in storage and download. (users with 50kb/s ADSL
lines might really appreciate that.) Also with unrar beeing oss and all, rar
shouldn't really be a problem? It's a nice format.

p.s. sorry for the ~double~ post : )

The reason for using zip files can be found in comment #5. Maybe this is no
longer true ...

How is the progress on this one? Portage still only has version 1.50 and the
required .rar file for it isn't available anymore.

There is no progress on this one, nor will there be until bug #106789 is
resolved, hence why it has it listed as a dependency.

this package has a fetch restriction, and upstream doesn't provide the sources
anymore.  this needs to be either bumped or masked.

(In reply to comment #17)
> this package has a fetch restriction, and upstream doesn't provide the sources
> anymore.  this needs to be either bumped or masked.
> 

Do what? Version 1.52 is available here:
http://nwvault.ign.com/View.php?view=hakpaks.Detail&id=6060

If you're talking about 1.50, file a new bug.  This bug is about 1.52.

this bug is about bumping nwn-cep from 1.50 to 1.52.  the current ebuild in the
tree (1.50) is unusable because the sources (for 1.50) aren't available
anywhere.  so this either needs to be either bumped to 1.52 now or put into
package.mask until it can be bumped.  as a point of QA, we don't keep broken
ebuilds in the portage tree.

Then please file a bug on 1.50 not working properly and we will address that
separately.  We will also need to adjust this ebuild, if it is to be used, to
ensure it installs properly in the case of someone having both SoU and HotU,
since I don't use this particular package, I'm not sure if the current ebuild
solution is the correct one.  Anyone?

Bug# 129900.  i'm also getting my hands on a copy of NWN Platinum soon so
hopefully i can help w/ testing this.

OK.  I've added two separate ebuilds for 1.52 into the tree.  There is a
1.52-r1 ebuild, which is in package.mask, that goes with the ebuilds from
106789, while the 1.52 ebuild works with the current stable.

Enjoy!