Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 77577
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Tim Yamin (RETIRED) <plasmaroo@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Brandon N Atkinson <brandon.atkinson@ieee.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 77577 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 77577 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2005-01-11 12:42 0000
Trying to emerge iverilog with the stable x86 flag set, portage attempts to
merge with version 0.7.  The URI in the ebuild refers to a broken snapshot of
0.7.  This is obviously not a portage problem, but it is interesting that a
broken snapshot is used for the 'stable' build, while the unstable flag ~x86
works. 

I have verified that 0.7 tarball is broken by downloading the file by hand and
attempting to install.



Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. emerge iverilog (with USE="x86")
2. compile dies during compilation of load_module.cc
3. 

Actual Results:  
Build stops due to compilation failure.  The tar.gz contains broken code.  

Expected Results:  
Build works, iverilog is installed correctly.

I understand that we have no control over bad files upstream, but should broken
code be chosen for the stable build over working code (i.e. verilog-0.8)?

------- Comment #1 From Patrick Kursawe 2005-01-12 09:33:34 0000 -------
0.8 is only in portage for a few days, but considering that I can't get 0.7 to
build with gcc 3.3 or 3.4 I think you are right. Looks like most people who use
it emerged it long ago in the past when it still went through the compiler.

------- Comment #2 From Tim Yamin (RETIRED) 2005-01-12 12:40:09 0000 -------
0.8 stabled on x86 in CVS; please reopen this bug and let me know if that also
has issues. Thanks!

Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug