First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 74983
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Text-Markup Team <text-markup@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Robert Turnbull <Robert.Turnbull@sci.monash.edu.au>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
eqe-1.0.4-r1.ebuild Ebuild for perl version of latex equation editor. text/plain Robert Turnbull 2004-12-19 15:46 0000 485 bytes Details
eqe-1.2.0.ebuild Updated ebuild text/plain Robert Turnbull 2005-12-26 17:10 0000 611 bytes Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 74983 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 74983 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2004-12-19 15:43 0000
Hi!

Please find attached eqe-1.0.4-r1.ebuild.

eqe is a clone of the OSX Latex Equation Editor which allows you to type in latex text and it generates an image which you can drag and drop into applications. This one is written in perl. This is my first time submitting an ebuild - sorry if I muck things up.

rob

------- Comment #1 From Robert Turnbull 2004-12-19 15:46:19 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=46375) [details]
Ebuild for perl version of latex equation editor.

------- Comment #2 From Mamoru KOMACHI (RETIRED) 2005-02-12 09:39:51 0000 -------
Sorry for the delay. Will look into it as soon as possible.

------- Comment #3 From Mamoru KOMACHI (RETIRED) 2005-05-28 22:00:44 0000 -------
Sorry for the delay. I added it to CVS (app-office/eqe).
It's cool program, isn't it ;) Thanks for your contribution.

------- Comment #4 From Robert Turnbull 2005-12-26 17:10:15 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=75573) [details]
Updated ebuild

Hi again,

I've updated the ebuild so that it works with the latest release of eqe.

Please find attachment eqe-1.2.0.ebuild

rob

------- Comment #5 From Alexandre Buisse (RETIRED) 2005-12-31 06:55:00 0000 -------
Thanks, 1.2.0 is now in CVS. I had to slightly modify your ebuild, it did not
run pod2man to produce the mans and forgot to install the template tex file.

------- Comment #6 From Robert Turnbull 2006-01-02 16:07:28 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> Thanks, 1.2.0 is now in CVS. I had to slightly modify your ebuild, it did not
> run pod2man to produce the mans and forgot to install the template tex file.
> 

Thanks, that's great.

Rob

------- Comment #7 From Robert Turnbull 2006-02-13 15:42:49 0000 -------
Hello!

The latest release of eqe is 1.3.0, no dependencies have changed, nor any of
the installation method. I was able to install it by copying the
eqe-1.2.0.ebuild (that's in CVS) to eqe-1.3.0.ebuild.

(By the way: What needs to be done for this package to be considered stable?)

Rob

------- Comment #8 From Martin Ehmsen (RETIRED) 2006-02-14 02:34:21 0000 -------
Please don't reopen this bug whenever there is a version bump.
This bug is about the inclusion of eqe in portage. You should open a new bug
about version bumps the next time (I have bumped it).
This is not to sound harsh, it is just much easier for us to keep things
separated.

About stabilizing eqe (thats a separate issue as well, ie. a new bug), it must
not depend on unstable (on the particular arch) packages (and versions of the
packages). And then it must not have bugs and must have been in unstable for
more than 30 days.

------- Comment #9 From Robert Turnbull 2006-02-14 05:30:17 0000 -------
Thanks Martin, I'll create new bugs from now on.
Thanks also for bumping the package.
Rob



(In reply to comment #8)
> Please don't reopen this bug whenever there is a version bump.
> This bug is about the inclusion of eqe in portage. You should open a new bug
> about version bumps the next time (I have bumped it).
> This is not to sound harsh, it is just much easier for us to keep things
> separated.
> 
> About stabilizing eqe (thats a separate issue as well, ie. a new bug), it must
> not depend on unstable (on the particular arch) packages (and versions of the
> packages). And then it must not have bugs and must have been in unstable for
> more than 30 days.
> 

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug