First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 74586
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: UPSTREAM
Assigned To: AMD64 Project <amd64@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Jason Sievert <jsievert@jsievert.net>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Flags: Requestee:
  ()

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
patch ipw2200 amd64 patch patch Jason Sievert 2004-12-15 21:18 0000 1.84 KB Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 74586 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 74586 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2004-12-15 20:20 0000
Be gentel this is my first.

I have taken a patch that I have found for getting version 0.6 to work on amd64 and have modified it to work with the latest version 0.18.  I have been using this patch starting 0.12 and it works great.  0.18 does require the new firmware that was introduced in 0.17.

diff -u ipw2200-0.18/ipw2200.c ipw2200-0.18-amd64/ipw2200.c
--- ipw2200-0.18/ipw2200.c      2004-12-14 11:40:41.000000000 -0600
+++ ipw2200-0.18-amd64/ipw2200.c        2004-12-15 22:09:13.401939832 -0600
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@
 #define ipw_read16(ipw, ofs) __ipw_read16(__FILE__, __LINE__, ipw, ofs)

 #define _ipw_read32(ipw, ofs) readl((void*)(ipw)->hw_base + (ofs))
-static inline u32 __ipw_read32(char *f, u32 l, struct ipw_priv *ipw, u32 ofs) {
+static u32 __ipw_read32(char *f, u32 l, struct ipw_priv *ipw, u32 ofs) {
        IPW_DEBUG_IO("%s %d: read_direct32(0x%08X)\n", f, l, (u32)(ofs));
        return _ipw_read32(ipw, ofs);
 }
@@ -1827,8 +1827,8 @@
        cb->status = control ^src_address ^dest_address;

        /* Copy the Source and Destination addresses */
-       cb->dest_addr = (void *)dest_address;
-       cb->source_addr = (void *)src_address;
+       cb->dest_addr = dest_address;
+       cb->source_addr = src_address;

        /* Copy the Control Word last */
        cb->control = control;
@@ -6817,6 +6817,15 @@
        }

        pci_set_master(pdev);
+#define PCI_DMA_32BIT 0x00000000ffffffffULL
+       err = pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, PCI_DMA_32BIT);
+       if (!err) {
+               pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(pdev, PCI_DMA_32BIT);
+       } else {
+               printk(KERN_WARNING DRV_NAME ": No suitable DMA available.\n");
+               goto out_pci_disable_device;
+       }
+
        pci_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);

        err = pci_request_regions(pdev, DRV_NAME);
diff -u ipw2200-0.18/ipw2200.h ipw2200-0.18-amd64/ipw2200.h
--- ipw2200-0.18/ipw2200.h      2004-12-14 11:40:41.000000000 -0600
+++ ipw2200-0.18-amd64/ipw2200.h        2004-12-15 22:06:17.442689704 -0600
@@ -661,8 +661,8 @@
 struct command_block
 {
        unsigned int control;
-       void *source_addr;
-       void *dest_addr;
+       u32 source_addr;
+       u32 dest_addr;
        unsigned int status;
 } __attribute__ ((packed));


Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.




Portage 2.0.51-r8 (default-linux/amd64/2004.3, gcc-3.4.3,
glibc-2.3.4.20041102-r0, 2.6.10-rc3 x86_64)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.10-rc3 x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3400+
Gentoo Base System version 1.6.7
Python:              dev-lang/python-2.3.4 [2.3.4 (#1, Oct 17 2004, 09:55:06)]
dev-lang/python:     2.3.4
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.59-r6, 2.13
sys-devel/automake:  1.9.3, 1.5, 1.7.9, 1.6.3, 1.8.5-r2, 1.4_p6
sys-devel/binutils:  2.15.92.0.2-r1
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.10-r1
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.8.1-r1
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64 ~amd64"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CFLAGS="-march=athlon64 -O3 -ffast-math -funroll-all-loops -funit-at-a-time
-fpeel-loops -ftracer -funswitch-loops"
CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb /usr/kde/2/share/config
/usr/kde/3.3/env /usr/kde/3.3/share/config /usr/kde/3.3/shutdown
/usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/lib/mozilla/defaults/pref /usr/share/config
/var/qmail/control"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d"
CXXFLAGS="-march=athlon64 -O3 -ffast-math -funroll-all-loops -funit-at-a-time
-fpeel-loops -ftracer -funswitch-loops"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoaddcvs autoconfig ccache distlocks sandbox"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://gentoo.mirrors.pair.com/"
MAKEOPTS="-j2"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY=""
SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="amd64 X aalib acpi alsa apache2 audiofile avi berkdb bitmap-fonts
bootsplash cdparanoia cdr crypt cups directfb divx4linux dvd dvdr eds esd
ethereal evo exif f77 fam flac flash fortran gif gnome gpg gphoto gphoto2 gpm
gstreamer gtk gtk2 hal imagemagick imlib ipv6 java jp2 jpeg kde libwww lzw
lzw-tiff mad mozilla mpeg msn multilib mysql ncurses nls nptl offensive
oggvorbis opengl oscar oss pam pcmcia pda perl php png python qt quicktime
readline samba sdl sndfile spell ssl svg tcltk tcpd tiff truetype usb
userlocales wifi xine xml xml2 xmms xpm xrandr xv zlib"

------- Comment #1 From Joe McCann (RETIRED) 2004-12-15 21:08:13 0000 -------
please create an attachment for patches

------- Comment #2 From Jason Sievert 2004-12-15 21:18:45 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=46101) [details]
ipw2200 amd64 patch

------- Comment #3 From Henrik Brix Andersen 2004-12-16 00:33:00 0000 -------
Has this patch been submitted upstream at http://www.bughost.org?

------- Comment #4 From Jason Sievert 2004-12-16 05:16:03 0000 -------
No i have not yet.  Going to do that right now.  Just learing the ropes as I
go.

------- Comment #5 From Jason Sievert 2004-12-16 05:20:53 0000 -------
Bug submitted upstream
http://www.bughost.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=502

------- Comment #6 From Henrik Brix Andersen 2004-12-16 07:03:11 0000 -------
Thanks. I'll keep an eye on it.

------- Comment #7 From Jeremy Maitin-Shepard 2004-12-22 20:26:20 0000 -------
I do not have an amd64 machine on which to test this patch.  It seems it would
indeed be better to just get this patch applied upstream; the ipw2200
developers seem quite willing to apply user-submitted patches.  If they are
not, then I would see no problem in applying it in the ebuild.  (Re-open the
bug if the patch is not applied upstream.)

------- Comment #8 From Jason Sievert 2005-01-17 09:21:23 0000 -------
http://www.bughost.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=502

Looks like support will be added in .20!

------- Comment #9 From Henrik Brix Andersen 2005-01-17 09:30:06 0000 -------
*** Bug 75848 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug