Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 69728
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: DUPLICATE of bug 33843
Assigned To: Text-Markup Team <text-markup@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Peter Simons <simons@cryp.to>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 69728 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 69728 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2004-11-01 08:02 0000 
According to my newly updated portage, the XHTML DTD blocks gtk-doc and vice
versa. I was wondering how that is possible? Why would a DTD -- a _standard_
DTD, no less -- block a package? What does gtk-doc care about a bunch of text
files in /usr/share/sgml?

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

------- Comment #1 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2004-11-01 08:40:51 0000 ------- 
OK, see Bug 33843. It

------- Comment #2 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2004-11-01 08:40:51 0000 ------- 
OK, see Bug 33843. It´s blocked b/c someone reported that it allegedly breaks
things, like in Bug 32542, but that bug was fixed in another way, so I don´t
see the reason either. 

Someone should reopen Bug 33843 and mark this one as duplicate of that bug.
This should finally be solved. Blocking is not a solution. :-(

------- Comment #3 From Daniel Black 2004-11-02 02:01:08 0000 ------- 
 Carsten and Mike - does this need readdressing?

------- Comment #4 From Peter Simons 2005-01-08 12:23:16 0000 ------- 
Are there any new insights how this problem might be solved?

------- Comment #5 From Carsten Lohrke 2005-01-09 08:05:21 0000 ------- 
> Carsten and Mike - does this need readdressing?

Sorry everyone - somehow never noticed this bug report. I have absolutely no idea, why this bug was assigned to me.

------- Comment #6 From Peter Simons 2005-01-22 10:28:47 0000 ------- 
Is there anything happening to get this fixed? I've been getting blocked
packages for over 2 months now and I don't know how to fix it except for
uninstalling them. It would be really, really nice to get rid of this problem.

------- Comment #7 From Peter Simons 2005-01-22 10:36:20 0000 ------- 
Bump severity to major. This problem is keeping me from properly updating
several packages.

------- Comment #8 From foser (RETIRED) 2005-01-23 02:08:37 0000 ------- 
text guys are more likely to say anything sensible reharding this issue.

------- Comment #9 From Peter Simons 2005-02-05 05:50:38 0000 ------- 
So, um, text guys. Is there anything you can do to help me get rid of this
problem?

------- Comment #10 From Peter Simons 2005-03-23 07:52:23 0000 ------- 
It would be sooo nice if this problem were fixed within the next two or three
months ...

------- Comment #11 From Peter Simons 2005-04-18 02:37:22 0000 ------- 
HUHU? Anyone alive out there?

------- Comment #12 From Leonardo Boshell (RETIRED) 2005-05-27 02:41:30 0000 ------- 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 33843 ***
Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug