Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 63301
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Java team <java@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Thomas Matthijs (RETIRED) <axxo@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 63301 depends on: 168991 176971 Show dependency tree
Bug 63301 blocks: 63304 69972
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2004-09-08 08:28 0000 
Following the new java policy, packages shouldn't rely on packed jars,
dependencies need to be added on our own packages and used.

------- Comment #1 From Eddy Mulyono 2004-11-09 23:15:20 0000 ------- 
I'm trying to make an ebuild for javahelp-2.0.02.

I'm having trouble compiling from source. Some source files are missing (not included?) in javahelp-2_0_02.zip/jh2.0/src.jar. I looked at an older version's javahelp-1.1.3.zip/jh1.1.3/src.jar, but they're not there either.

Apparently, the classes are present in bytecode in javahelp-2_0_02.zip/jh2.0/javahelp/lib/jhall.jar.

Some of the offending classes are in package com.sun.java.help.impl:
XmlReader, ParserListener, Parser, ParserEvent, Tag, TagProperties, LangElement.

Any suggestions on where I should go with the ebuild?

(methinks that I can extract jhall.jar, and use the offending binary-only classes, but that would defeat the whole "anti-trojan" thing as mentioned in http://gentoo-wiki.com/Why_Build_Java_Code_From_Source).

Is this an upstream bug?

------- Comment #2 From Karl Trygve Kalleberg (RETIRED) 2004-11-18 15:55:49 0000 ------- 
I haven't looked at the specifics, but anything that relies on com.sun.* which
is not Sun's own stuff should be eyed with some suspicion. 

It may be worthwhile to report this as a bug upstream, but I fear you wont get
much sympathy.

------- Comment #3 From Vlastimil Babka (Caster) 2006-12-08 13:02:55 0000 ------- 
Now it should be possible.

------- Comment #4 From Petteri Räty 2007-06-15 22:03:01 0000 ------- 
javahelp-bin is package.masked and going away.
Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug