First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 60157
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Fonts Team <fonts@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Jung Tae-young <master@mytears.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
baekmuk-fonts-2.2.ebuild media-fonts/baekmuk-fonts-2.2.ebuild text/plain Jung Tae-young 2004-08-12 10:56 0000 491 bytes Details
baekmuk-ttf-2.2.ebuild media-fonts/baekmuk-ttf-2.2.ebuild text/plain Jung Tae-young 2004-08-12 10:56 0000 535 bytes Details
baekmuk-bdf-2.2.ebuild media-fonts/baekmuk-bdf-2.2.ebuild text/plain Jung Tae-young 2004-08-12 10:57 0000 738 bytes Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 60157 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 60157 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2004-08-12 10:55 0000 
Baekmuk is Korean BSD License fonts
August.8 2004.. baekmuk-ttf & baekmuk-bdf 2.2 released


I split baekmuk-fonts.ebuild to baekmuk-ttf & baekmuk-bdf 
and make them to use font.eclass



Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:

------- Comment #1 From Jung Tae-young 2004-08-12 10:56:06 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=37295) [details]
media-fonts/baekmuk-fonts-2.2.ebuild

------- Comment #2 From Jung Tae-young 2004-08-12 10:56:43 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=37296) [details]
media-fonts/baekmuk-ttf-2.2.ebuild

------- Comment #3 From Jung Tae-young 2004-08-12 10:57:15 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=37297) [details]
media-fonts/baekmuk-bdf-2.2.ebuild

------- Comment #4 From Mamoru KOMACHI (RETIRED) 2004-08-17 15:42:32 0000 ------- 
Hi, thanks for the report. I added 2.2 ebuild without the package split. We
don't have any meta package for only installing ttf and bdf fonts. If we split
baekmuk-fonts into two ebuilds, we don't need a placeholder for them maybe? (as
in lfpfonts-{var,fix}) I think it is not so useful to create a meta package for
installing only two ebuilds.

------- Comment #5 From Jung Tae-young 2004-08-17 21:47:07 0000 ------- 
there's many ebuilds depend on baekmuk-fonts ..
(ex: xfree, xorg-x11, ghostscript, ... etc )


so I think there's placeholder until all dependence are solved :)

------- Comment #6 From Mamoru KOMACHI (RETIRED) 2004-08-17 23:29:17 0000 ------- 
Which font do they really depend on? (I cannot find any dependency to
baekmuk-fonts in xfree and xorg-x11, though) As for ghostscript, it seems that
it depends on baekmuk TrueType fonts. It doesn't make sense for ghostscript to
depend on baekmuk-fonts without ttf, does it? So the correct way of handling
this for the moment is to split them into bdf and ttf, and then make
ghostscript depend on baekmuk-ttf, right?

------- Comment #7 From Jung Tae-young 2004-08-18 02:00:51 0000 ------- 
you're right.. I removed the baekmuk-fonts && emerge -uDpv world then.. there's
no dependency problem except ghostscript, ghostscript-afpl

and ghostscript need baekmuk-ttf


thanx for attension.. :D

------- Comment #8 From Donnie Berkholz 2004-08-20 01:16:39 0000 ------- 
Why not just have a USE flag for whichever one's less important?

------- Comment #9 From Jung Tae-young 2004-08-20 01:43:39 0000 ------- 
truetype is more important but.. I can't find.. proper USE flag.. in
profile/use.desc..


p.s) 
truetype font can also be used in gd, freetype.. etc..  
it's better to remove X USE flag in baekmuk-fonts-2.2.ebuild

------- Comment #10 From foser (RETIRED) 2004-08-20 05:54:26 0000 ------- 
the latest ghostscript also uses fontconfig.

anyway, why not just install both if they're really needed ? (i doubt it..)
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug