Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 55698
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Security <security@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Chris White (RETIRED) <chriswhite@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Flags: Requestee:
 
 
  ()

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
rsbac-bugfix-v1.2.3-3.diff RSBAC JAIL module patch patch Chris White (RETIRED) 2004-06-30 10:53 0000 557 bytes Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 55698 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 55698 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2004-06-30 10:49 0000 
The JAIL module in RSBAC has been discovered to have a flaw in its checking to
see if files should be created by a user.

Because of this flaw, a program created by a user could create suid and sguid
files using sys_creat, sys_open, and sys_mknod.

A patch was created to address this issue.  Bug was reported by Brad Sprengler.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

------- Comment #1 From Chris White (RETIRED) 2004-06-30 10:53:01 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=34504) [details]
RSBAC JAIL module patch

------- Comment #2 From Guillaume Destuynder (RETIRED) 2004-06-30 13:50:00 0000 ------- 
rsbac-sources and rsbac-dev-sources both include v1.2.3-3 fix for JAIL bugs as
of today.

------- Comment #3 From Guillaume Destuynder (RETIRED) 2004-06-30 14:02:18 0000 ------- 
erroneously resolved the bug too early.

------- Comment #4 From Thierry Carrez (RETIRED) 2004-07-01 02:27:34 0000 ------- 
Which packages are affected by this ? Only rsbac-sources and rsbac-dev-sources
?

------- Comment #5 From Guillaume Destuynder (RETIRED) 2004-07-01 03:30:25 0000 ------- 
yes
rsbac-sources and rsbac-dev-sources;

both are masked in ~x86 and there never was a stable ebuild yet (its too young) so no GLSA is normally needed.

------- Comment #6 From Tim Yamin (RETIRED) 2004-07-03 16:05:48 0000 ------- 
GLSA 200407-02; http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.announce/382;
closing as FIXED.
Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug