Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 53948
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Jared H. Hudson (RETIRED) <jhhudso@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Georgi Georgiev <chutz@gg3.net>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
djb.patch djbdns-1.05-r12.patch patch Georgi Georgiev 2004-06-14 23:21 0000 1.88 KB Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 53948 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 53948 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2004-06-14 23:19 0000 
A new version of the ipv6 patch from fefe.de is available. The new version
obsoletes the ipv6arpa patch, as it creates both entries. It also includes the
errno patch, so minor tweaking of the ebuild is needed.

------- Comment #1 From Georgi Georgiev 2004-06-14 23:21:11 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=33287) [details]
djbdns-1.05-r12.patch

- Update the ipv6 patch to test21
- Remove the obsolete ipv6arpa use flag and patch
- Rearrange patches to apply properly

------- Comment #2 From Jared H. Hudson (RETIRED) 2004-06-16 22:32:48 0000 ------- 
Please provide a diff of a new ebuild that uses this patch.
Also, make the ebuild fetch from an official source. We do not want to put patches directly into the portage tree unless we have no choice. The reason for this is bloat. The portage tree is already extremely large and growing.

------- Comment #3 From Georgi Georgiev 2004-06-16 22:38:22 0000 ------- 
Huh, did you read the patch I attached?

Ah, probably the name is misleading or you simply didn't see it. It is a patch for the djbdns-1.05-r12.ebuild and judging by your comment -- you'll like it.

------- Comment #4 From Jared H. Hudson (RETIRED) 2004-06-23 14:46:35 0000 ------- 
Thanks! Sorry I didn't read the patch carefully enough. It was perfect. I've
added this as -r13 and marked -r12 as stable for x86
Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug