First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 37704
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo X packagers <x11@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Seiji Kumagai <skumagai@ic.sunysb.edu>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 37704 depends on: 36391 Show dependency tree
Bug 37704 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2004-01-09 08:42 0000 
Media-fonts/aquapfont was removed from portage tree based on a bug
report(36391). However, media-fonts/aquapfont is not a duplicate of
media-fonts/aquafont.

As the "p" in the package name indicates, aquapfont is a "propotional" font,
while aquafont is not.

And the version number of these fonts differs because the original author
mentains them seperately (currently aquafont is 2.7 and aquapfont is 2.5).

Re-add aquapfont in the portage tree, please.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:




Expected Results:  
media-fonts/aquapfont reappears in the portage tree.

------- Comment #1 From Donnie Berkholz 2004-01-09 17:55:23 0000 ------- 
Sorry about that. Anyway, will get the fonts herd made this weekend once I'm
back on broadband and fix my mistake unless someone else cares to.

------- Comment #2 From Donnie Berkholz 2004-01-12 21:58:24 0000 ------- 
Fixed in CVS.

------- Comment #3 From Donnie Berkholz 2004-07-23 20:11:37 0000 ------- 
*** Bug 58142 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #4 From Pascal Brax 2004-07-24 09:21:37 0000 ------- 
i suggest to change the short description so that aquafont and aquapfont does
not appear as dupes

------- Comment #5 From Mamoru KOMACHI (RETIRED) 2004-07-24 09:40:46 0000 ------- 
Yup, changed that today. Thanks for the comment.
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug