Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 283531
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: NEW
Resolution:
Assigned To: Gentoo's Haskell Language team <haskell@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Jeroen Roovers <jer@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 283531 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 283531 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.








View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2009-09-02 16:50 0000
Again, keywords dropped without notification to the stricken arch teams. I am
of a mind to drop HPPA support altogether because this has happened once too
often to my liking. Is it really that hard to file a bug report when you do
that version bump?

------- Comment #1 From Lennart Kolmodin 2009-09-02 23:21:25 0000 -------
The plan is to get ghc 6.10.4 working, everything else is less interesting.
It's become a bit more interesting though, now that readline-6 is going stable.

If you want to help, you could carefully build the ghc 6.8.2-r1 build.
The ultimate goal is 6.10.4 though, which is still hard masked due to the
changes we make from time to time. If you don't mind making many binaries, you
can go ahead and make ebuilds for that too.

We do post bug reports for ebuilds we believe in, not wasted work, or you'd get
three times as many.

------- Comment #2 From Mounir Lamouri (volkmar) 2009-10-05 20:31:48 0000 -------
Is bug 206643 fixed with 6.10.4 ?

------- Comment #3 From Lennart Kolmodin 2009-10-31 16:05:34 0000 -------
I'll post a keywording bug shortly about the new ghc 6.10.4 ebuild that just
got unmasked.

And yes, bug #206643 should not be present for this ebuild. That bug is a
combination of 1) old ghc/ghc-bin logic, 2) some more liberal logic that we had
intended only to keep in the overlay but it accidentally got committed (afaik).

Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug