Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 26837
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo KDE team <kde@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Rafal Rzepecki <divided.mind@gmail.com>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
ksms-0.1.2.1.ebuild ksms-0.1.2.1.ebuild text/plain Rafal Rzepecki 2003-08-17 19:47 0000 542 bytes Details
ksms-0.1.2.1-empty-store.diff ksms-0.1.2.1-empty-store.diff patch Rafal Rzepecki 2003-08-17 19:48 0000 1.12 KB Details | Diff
ChangeLog ChangeLog text/plain Rafal Rzepecki 2003-08-17 19:48 0000 445 bytes Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 26837 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 26837 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2003-08-17 19:45 0000 
Attached is an ebuild for ksms, a KDE sms sender/archiver. 
Also there is a little patch that fixes a problem that showed up on my box, 
namely crash with SIGFPE if local message store is nonexistant.

------- Comment #1 From Rafal Rzepecki 2003-08-17 19:47:02 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=16243) [details]
ksms-0.1.2.1.ebuild

I suggest the net-misc category.

------- Comment #2 From Rafal Rzepecki 2003-08-17 19:48:06 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=16244) [details]
ksms-0.1.2.1-empty-store.diff

------- Comment #3 From Rafal Rzepecki 2003-08-17 19:48:26 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=16245) [details]
ChangeLog

------- Comment #4 From Caleb Tennis 2003-08-27 19:23:38 0000 ------- 
In portage.  Your patch doesn't apply cleanly - can you rework it and send it
again?  Thanks.

------- Comment #5 From Rafal Rzepecki 2003-08-28 03:50:40 0000 ------- 
Well it does apply cleanly here. What exactly is your problem with the patch? 
Also, I don't understand why didn't you use the patch mechanism involving base 
eclass and PATCHES environment variable (as I did)? And why did you deleted 
the RDEPEND variable? 
Also the first line in the ChangeLog refers to kmymoney... 
 
Reopening the bug because the patch is vital.

------- Comment #6 From Caleb Tennis 2003-08-28 06:18:27 0000 ------- 
You are right - on a completely different machine now the patch works...fixing. 

ALso, the only reason I changed the patching mechanism was to test and see if
epach worked 
vs. what I couldn't get to work. 

But it all looks good now (I hope).
Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug