New version 0.14 of media-gfx/ufraw is available (see http://ufraw.sourceforge.net). I am attaching an ebuild in a minute. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install ufraw 2. 3.
bumped in cvs, thanks for the report.
0.14.1 is just out, can you please also consider adding --enable-dst-correction and --enable-contrast?
(In reply to comment #2) > 0.14.1 is just out, can you please also consider adding --enable-dst-correction > and --enable-contrast? I saw the switches, but was unsure if I should enable them (or add USE-flags). * Experimental contrast adjustment. Patch by Bruce Guenter. Enabled with './configure --enable-contrast'. * Added --enable-dst-correction configuration option to use local time (with DST) for file timestamps. IMHO a dst or timezone USE-flag would make sense. But I am not sure about the contrast switch, is this one visible in the GUI or just an alternative algorithm for the contrast bar in the GUI?
(In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > 0.14.1 is just out, can you please also consider adding --enable-dst-correction > > and --enable-contrast? > > I saw the switches, but was unsure if I should enable them (or add USE-flags). > > * Experimental contrast adjustment. Patch by Bruce Guenter. Enabled with > './configure --enable-contrast'. > * Added --enable-dst-correction configuration option to use local time (with > DST) for file timestamps. > > IMHO a dst or timezone USE-flag would make sense. But I am not sure about the > contrast switch, is this one visible in the GUI or just an alternative > algorithm for the contrast bar in the GUI? > Markus, The contrast adjustment code and UI option is disabled if --enable-contrast is not passed to configure. It is still marked as experimental by the UFRaw authors as the results are inconsistent. See http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=2218079&forum_id=434060
bumped in cvs, added USE-flags for dst and contrast option.
Contrast adjustment works great for me and if it works badly for someone, he may simply set it to 1.00 and thus ignore :) So I agree it should have use-flag. I also strongly suggest to add ebuild for GtkImageView http://trac.bjourne.webfactional.com/wiki - it provides zoom control to image preview. Without it UFRaw loses much of its usability.
Created attachment 170269 [details] Rough ebuild for gtkimageview-1.6.1 This is a rough ebuild for gtkimageview-1.6.1 Dependencies are missing You need to download the source tarball manually from the website and place it in your distfiles directory as I don't know how to handle the options in the url properly (there is an additional "?format=raw" parameter). I put it in my portage overlay under x11-libs as that seems the most logical place for it. Once this is installed, ufraw will detect gtkimageview and enable it so you have a scrollable preview window.I tested it with ufraw-0.14.1 Hope this helps those dearly missing this functionality of ufraw...
just FYI, gtkimageview is going to be mandatory for the next release of ufraw. I already prepared an ebuild for gtkimageview, which is available in my overlay: http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=dev/maekke.git;a=summary I will add it to the tree as soon as there's a new ufraw release.