First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 240608
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: C++ Team <cpp@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Peter Alfredsen <loki_val@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
build.log ppc64 build failure text/plain Brent Baude 2009-01-07 20:38 0000 125.99 KB Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 240608 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 240608 blocks: 245160
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2008-10-08 22:42 0000 
It's been in the tree for almost half a year. We should get this stabled.
Please add arches if you agree:
amd64@gentoo.org,ppc64@gentoo.org,ppc@gentoo.org,sparc@gentoo.org,x86@gentoo.org

------- Comment #1 From Alex Cannon 2008-10-13 03:39:28 0000 ------- 
Should STLport-5.1.2 be masked on ppc because it doesn't build, at least on my
system as I reported in bug 240604?

------- Comment #2 From Peter Alfredsen 2008-10-13 16:15:52 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #1)
> Should STLport-5.1.2 be masked on ppc because it doesn't build, at least on my
> system as I reported in bug 240604?
> 

Nope. That bug was due to you using gcc-4.3.1 which is still ~arch(unstable) on
all arches with STLport-5.1.2 which is arch(stable). But it is the reason I'm
asking for 5.1.5 to be stabled, so we don't have this problem when gcc-4.3.x
goes stable.

------- Comment #3 From Peter Alfredsen 2008-11-01 21:24:12 0000 ------- 
*** Bug 245194 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #4 From Peter Alfredsen 2008-11-01 21:28:00 0000 ------- 
No response from cpp team.
Arches, please mark stable on my say-so.

------- Comment #5 From Markus Meier 2008-11-02 12:17:48 0000 ------- 
amd64/x86 stable

------- Comment #6 From nixnut 2008-11-08 11:38:45 0000 ------- 
ppc stable

------- Comment #7 From Raúl Porcel 2008-11-30 19:08:19 0000 ------- 
sparc stable

------- Comment #8 From Brent Baude 2009-01-07 20:38:45 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=177711) [details]
ppc64 build failure

------- Comment #9 From Brent Baude 2009-01-07 20:39:08 0000 ------- 
Anyone else seeing test failures?

------- Comment #10 From Peter Alfredsen 2009-01-07 22:24:32 0000 ------- 
WFM

------- Comment #11 From Jeremy Olexa (darkside) 2009-02-06 21:26:42 0000 ------- 
What is the status here. fails on only ppc64? What should be done?

------- Comment #12 From Brent Baude 2009-02-06 22:08:22 0000 ------- 
still fails here on ppc64 in exact same way

------- Comment #13 From Peter Alfredsen 2009-02-12 05:54:31 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #12)
> still fails here on ppc64 in exact same way

Does 5.1.2 fail in the same way? If yes, mark stable and file a bug. If no,
we'll have to think of something.

------- Comment #14 From Brent Baude 2009-03-02 20:07:45 0000 ------- 
Marking STLport-5.1.5 ppc64 for bug 240608; fails same tests as current stable

------- Comment #15 From Peter Alfredsen 2009-03-02 20:11:26 0000 ------- 
No arches left. Fixed.
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug