Home | Docs | Forums | Lists | Bugs | Planet | Store | GMN | Get Gentoo!
Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.
View Bug Activity | Format For Printing | XML | Clone This Bug
patch failed while emerging evms. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.emerge --sync 2.emerge evms 3. Actual Results: * Failed Patch: 51_all_2.5.5-glib_dep.patch ! * ( /var/tmp/portage/sys-fs/evms-2.5.5-r10/work/patches/51_all_2.5.5-glib_dep.patch ) Expected Results: emerge should install contents of /var/tmp/portage/sys-fs/evms-2.5.5-r10/temp/51_all_2.5.5-glib_dep.patch-29022.out: ***** 51_all_2.5.5-glib_dep.patch ***** NOTE: skipping -p0 due to absolute paths in patch: 1:--- /root/aclocal.m4.old 2006-10-21 18:51:30.000000000 +0200 ======================================= PATCH COMMAND: patch -p1 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < /var/tmp/portage/sys-fs/evms-2.5.5-r10/work/patches/51_all_2.5.5-glib_dep.patch ======================================= missing header for unified diff at line 3 of patch can't find file to patch at input line 3 Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |--- /root/aclocal.m4.old 2006-10-21 18:51:30.000000000 +0200 |+++ aclocal.m4 2006-10-21 20:48:07.000000000 +0200 -------------------------- No file to patch. Skipping patch. 3 out of 3 hunks ignored ======================================= PATCH COMMAND: patch -p2 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < /var/tmp/portage/sys-fs/evms-2.5.5-r10/work/patches/51_all_2.5.5-glib_dep.patch ======================================= missing header for unified diff at line 3 of patch can't find file to patch at input line 3 Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |--- /root/aclocal.m4.old 2006-10-21 18:51:30.000000000 +0200 |+++ aclocal.m4 2006-10-21 20:48:07.000000000 +0200 -------------------------- No file to patch. Skipping patch. 3 out of 3 hunks ignored ======================================= PATCH COMMAND: patch -p3 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < /var/tmp/portage/sys-fs/evms-2.5.5-r10/work/patches/51_all_2.5.5-glib_dep.patch ======================================= missing header for unified diff at line 3 of patch can't find file to patch at input line 3 Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |--- /root/aclocal.m4.old 2006-10-21 18:51:30.000000000 +0200 |+++ aclocal.m4 2006-10-21 20:48:07.000000000 +0200 -------------------------- No file to patch. Skipping patch. 3 out of 3 hunks ignored ======================================= PATCH COMMAND: patch -p3 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < /var/tmp/portage/sys-fs/evms-2.5.5-r10/work/patches/51_all_2.5.5-glib_dep.patch ======================================= missing header for unified diff at line 3 of patch can't find file to patch at input line 3 Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |--- /root/aclocal.m4.old 2006-10-21 18:51:30.000000000 +0200 |+++ aclocal.m4 2006-10-21 20:48:07.000000000 +0200 -------------------------- No file to patch. Skipping patch. 3 out of 3 hunks ignored ======================================= PATCH COMMAND: patch -p4 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < /var/tmp/portage/sys-fs/evms-2.5.5-r10/work/patches/51_all_2.5.5-glib_dep.patch ======================================= missing header for unified diff at line 3 of patch can't find file to patch at input line 3 Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |--- /root/aclocal.m4.old 2006-10-21 18:51:30.000000000 +0200 |+++ aclocal.m4 2006-10-21 20:48:07.000000000 +0200 -------------------------- No file to patch. Skipping patch. 3 out of 3 hunks ignored
Please post your `emerge --info' too.
emerge --info Portage 2.1.4.4 (default/linux/x86/2008.0/desktop, gcc-4.1.2, glibc-2.6.1-r0, 2.6.24-gentoo-r5 i686) ================================================================= System uname: 2.6.24-gentoo-r5 i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1300MHz Timestamp of tree: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 00:46:01 +0000 distcc 2.18.3 i686-pc-linux-gnu (protocols 1 and 2) (default port 3632) [disabled] ccache version 2.4 [disabled] app-shells/bash: 3.2_p33 dev-lang/python: 2.4.4-r13, 2.5.2-r7 dev-python/pycrypto: 2.0.1-r6 dev-util/ccache: 2.4-r7 sys-apps/baselayout: 1.12.11.1 sys-apps/sandbox: 1.2.18.1-r2 sys-devel/autoconf: 2.13, 2.61-r2 sys-devel/automake: 1.5, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r2, 1.10.1-r1 sys-devel/binutils: 2.18-r3 sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.4.0-r4 sys-devel/libtool: 1.5.26 virtual/os-headers: 2.6.23-r3 ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86" CBUILD="i686-pc-linux-gnu" CFLAGS="-O2 -march=i686 -pipe" CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu" CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc" CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/ca-certificates.conf /etc/env.d /etc/fonts/fonts.conf /etc/gconf /etc/revdep-rebuild /etc/terminfo /etc/udev/rules.d" CXXFLAGS="-O2 -march=i686 -pipe" DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles" FEATURES="distlocks metadata-transfer sandbox sfperms strict unmerge-orphans userfetch" GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/gentoo-distfiles/ http://gentoo.netnitco.net ftp://ftp.heanet.ie/pub/gentoo/ http://mirror.uni-c.dk/pub/gentoo/ http://213.186.33.38/gentoo-distfiles/" LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1" PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages" PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS="--recursive --links --safe-links --perms --times --compress --force --whole-file --delete --stats --timeout=180 --exclude=/distfiles --exclude=/local --exclude=/packages" PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp" PORTDIR="/usr/portage" PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage" SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage" USE="X acl acpi alsa berkdb bluetooth branding bzip2 cairo cdr cli cracklib crypt cups dbus dri dvd dvdr dvdread eds emboss encode esd evo fam firefox fortran gdbm gif gnome gpm gstreamer gtk hal iconv ipv6 isdnlog jpeg kde kerberos ldap libnotify mad midi mikmod mp3 mpeg mudflap ncurses nls nptl nptlonly nsplugin ogg opengl openmp pam pcre pdf perl png ppds pppd python qt3 qt3support qt4 quicktime readline reflection sdl session spell spl ssl startup-notification svg sysfs tcpd tiff truetype unicode usb vorbis win32codecs x86 xml xorg xv zlib" ALSA_CARDS="ali5451 als4000 atiixp atiixp-modem bt87x ca0106 cmipci emu10k1 emu10k1x ens1370 ens1371 es1938 es1968 fm801 hda-intel intel8x0 intel8x0m maestro3 trident usb-audio via82xx via82xx-modem ymfpci" ALSA_PCM_PLUGINS="adpcm alaw asym copy dmix dshare dsnoop empty extplug file hooks iec958 ioplug ladspa lfloat linear meter mmap_emul mulaw multi null plug rate route share shm softvol" APACHE2_MODULES="actions alias auth_basic authn_alias authn_anon authn_dbm authn_default authn_file authz_dbm authz_default authz_groupfile authz_host authz_owner authz_user autoindex cache dav dav_fs dav_lock deflate dir disk_cache env expires ext_filter file_cache filter headers include info log_config logio mem_cache mime mime_magic negotiation rewrite setenvif speling status unique_id userdir usertrack vhost_alias" ELIBC="glibc" INPUT_DEVICES="keyboard mouse evdev" KERNEL="linux" LCD_DEVICES="bayrad cfontz cfontz633 glk hd44780 lb216 lcdm001 mtxorb ncurses text" USERLAND="GNU" VIDEO_CARDS="fbdev glint i810 mach64 mga neomagic nv r128 radeon savage sis tdfx trident vesa vga via vmware voodoo" Unset: CPPFLAGS, CTARGET, EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS, FFLAGS, INSTALL_MASK, LANG, LC_ALL, LINGUAS, MAKEOPTS, PORTAGE_COMPRESS, PORTAGE_COMPRESS_FLAGS, PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS
destination file-name is wrong. '/root/aclocal.m4.old' should be '/root/aclocal.m4'
I'm guessing the patch tarball got updated recently, because this built fine a couple of weeks ago. It seems like a simple fix, but it apparently requires a reroll of the patch tarball, which should probably be left to the maintainer. I'm not trying to be annoying, but this is blocking some test builds I'm doing for releng :P
Editing the patch file and repack the tarball works for me. Anyway the compile process also said this: .../portage/sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r10.ebuild: line 43: [: 25.04: integer expression expected
Any update on this? Why seem to be there are no much ppl affected?
If dev-zero isn't available, can someone in base-system reroll this patch tarball and reupload it? This is still holding back releng work.
This just started happening to me after an update to sys-libs/e2fsprogs-libs-1.41.2 forced a rebuild of evms via @preserve-rebuild. Problem evident no ~x86 and ~amd64 systems. Are we going to see a version bump shortly?
Well, I didn't touch the patch tarball for a long time and I also don't experience the failure here: (using evms-2.5.5-r10.ebuild unpack) I get this: [...] >>> Unpacking source... >>> Unpacking evms-2.5.5.tar.gz to /var/tmp/portage/sys-fs/evms-2.5.5-r10/work >>> Unpacking evms-patches-2.5.5-1.tbz2 to /var/tmp/portage/sys-fs/evms-2.5.5-r10/work * Applying various patches (bugfixes/updates) ... * 01_all_2.5.5-md_super_fix.patch ... [ ok ] * 02_all_2.5.5-ntfs_unmkfs.patch ... [ ok ] * 03_all_2.5.5-raid5_degrade_fix_v2.patch ... [ ok ] * 04_all_2.5.5-raid5_remove_spare_fix.patch ... [ ok ] * 05_all_2.5.5-raid5_remove_spare_fix_2.patch ... [ ok ] * 06_all_2.5.5-raid5_algorithm.patch ... [ ok ] * 10_all_2.5.5-cli_reload_options.patch ... [ ok ] * 11_all_2.5.5-cli_query_segfault.patch ... [ ok ] * 12_all_2.5.5-get_geometry.patch ... [ ok ] * 15_all_2.5.5-BaseName.patch ... [ ok ] * 16_all_2.5.5-disk_cache.patch ... [ ok ] * 50_all_2.5.5-as-needed.patch ... [ ok ] * 51_all_2.5.5-glib_dep.patch ... [ ok ] * 52_all_2.5.5-ocfs2.patch ... [ ok ] * 53_all_2.5.5-use_disk_group.patch ... [ ok ] * 54_all_2.5.5-pagesize.patch ... [ ok ] * 55_all_2.5.5-snapshot.patch ... [ ok ] * Done with patching * Running eautoreconf in '/var/tmp/portage/sys-fs/evms-2.5.5-r10/work/evms-2.5.5' ... * Running autoconf ... [ ok ] * Running autoheader ... [ ok ] >>> Source unpacked.
+ 07 Oct 2008; Peter Alfredsen <loki_val@gentoo.org> + files/evms-2.5.5-glib_dep.patch, evms-2.5.5-r10.ebuild: + Fix bug 238685. Eutils eclass changed to disallow patching with -p0 when + the patch contained absolute paths, which caused the build to fail on + recently synced systems. +
Okay. So it wasn't a problem with the patch tarball per se, but at least it's fixed now. Thanks.
