First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 231836
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Security <security@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Robert Buchholz <rbu@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Flags: Requestee:
 
 
  ()

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
mplayer-1.0_rc2_p26753-CVE-2008-3162.patch mplayer-1.0_rc2_p26753-CVE-2008-3162.patch patch Robert Buchholz 2008-07-15 03:33 0000 2.92 KB Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 231836 depends on: 231831 241110 Show dependency tree
Bug 231836 blocks:

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2008-07-15 03:32 0000 
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #231831 +++

CVE-2008-3162 (http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2008-3162):
  Stack-based buffer overflow in the str_read_packet function in
  libavformat/psxstr.c in FFmpeg before r13993 allows remote attackers to cause
  a denial of service (application crash) or execute arbitrary code via a
  crafted STR file that interleaves audio and video sectors.

------- Comment #1 From Robert Buchholz 2008-07-15 03:33:22 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=160415) [details]
mplayer-1.0_rc2_p26753-CVE-2008-3162.patch

------- Comment #2 From Steve Dibb 2008-10-07 01:57:21 0000 ------- 
mplayer-1.0_rc2_p27725 in the tree

------- Comment #3 From Pierre-Yves Rofes 2008-10-09 21:53:00 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #2)
> mplayer-1.0_rc2_p27725 in the tree
> 

Some ~arch keywords are missing, is that intentional?

------- Comment #4 From Steve Dibb 2008-10-10 13:12:57 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > mplayer-1.0_rc2_p27725 in the tree
> > 
> 
> Some ~arch keywords are missing, is that intentional?
> 

No, that was a bit of a keyword snafoo on my part.  See bug 241110

------- Comment #5 From Christian Hoffmann 2008-10-19 09:51:08 0000 ------- 
Stabling is handled in bug 239130.

------- Comment #6 From Robert Buchholz 2008-11-29 14:08:42 0000 ------- 
request filed

------- Comment #7 From Tobias Heinlein 2009-01-12 19:50:53 0000 ------- 
GLSA 200901-07. Thanks everyone, sorry about the delay.
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug