New version of pymol is out (0.88). Appears you can just rename the ebuild as before and it works... http://www.pymol.org
Created attachment 13102 [details] pymol-0.88 ebuild Here is an ebuild for version 0.88. I don't know whether or not simply renaming the 0.86 ebuild works, but this new ebuild uses the distutils support that exists in version 0.88, so it is quite a bit different than the 0.86 ebuild. Cheers, Ben
Tested out the ebuild, compiles fine, but if you try to run it you get: [/home/geders ]$ pymol /usr/bin/python: can't open file '/var/tmp/portage/pymol-0.88/image/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/pymol/__init__.py' Looks like a path problem...
Created attachment 13114 [details] 'emerge pymol' output
Created attachment 13120 [details] pymol-0.88.ebuild Yes it was a path problem. It should be fixed in the new attachment. Believe it or not I did test the original before uploading it ;-) After looking at the code for the `dosed' command I realized two things: (1) I had been using it wrong in the first upload, and (2) it had worked for me because I hadn't clean out /var/tmp/portage/pymol-0.88/image prior to testing the first ebuild. Ooops. On a more general note, `dosed' seems rather broken to me. I would image that one most frequently uses it when presented with the situation I had when writing the pymol ebuild --- namely, you have a path like this /var/tmp/portage/pymol-0.88/image/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/pymol/__init__.py and you want to strip off the image dir portion. Well, dosed strips out ${D} for you, but ${D} includes a trailing slash (/). So you get this usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/pymol/__init__.py Not good. Ben
Created attachment 13364 [details] pymol-0.88 ebuild Small fix that causes a failure when you attempt to re-emerge the package.
s/fix/fix for a bug/
latest ebuild works for me now...
Hi guys. Ben: Thanks for the reworked ebuild. However could you please submit ebuild and the patch[es] as a separate attachmentes (text files) and not a tar file? It is much easier to handle it this way (do not worry about digests and Manifest - I will regenerate them anyway). Also, I noticed that you created 0.88 dir under files to keep patches. Is this really necessary just for the two of them? You can add $PV to their names, or if you want to keep the count of files down, even combine them in a single patch. Could you please reformat the patches as well? George
Created attachment 13580 [details] pymol 0.88 ebuild
Created attachment 13581 [details, diff] Turns off opening picture of Warren (sorry Warren).
Created attachment 13582 [details, diff] Get installation script to play nice with portage
George, Done. Yes, I guess the ${PV} subdirectory was unnecessary; it's gone now. Please let me know if you need anything else. Cheers, Ben
Thanks for quick responce. I have processed and committed the ebuild. Please test. George
Ebuild in portage is working for our dept
Closing this bug as fixed.
