First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 208188
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Michael Imhof <tantive@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Chris Smith <chris@realcomputerguy.com>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
apcupsd-3.14.3.ebuild.patch apcupsd-3.14.3.ebuild.patch patch Conrad Kostecki 2008-04-29 08:12 0000 195 bytes Details | Diff
hal-ups-policy.patch files/3.14.3/hal-ups-policy.patch text/plain Conrad Kostecki 2008-04-29 08:13 0000 637 bytes Details
hal-ups-policy.patch files/3.14.3/hal-ups-policy.patch patch Conrad Kostecki 2008-04-29 08:14 0000 637 bytes Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 208188 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 208188 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2008-01-30 16:46 0000 
3.14.3 released 1/20

Reproducible: Always

------- Comment #1 From Andrew Telford 2008-02-04 02:00:35 0000 ------- 
I upgraded to this by renaming the ebuild and files/ patches from 3.14.2

This version adds an extra file to hal which supposedly fixes contention
between hal and apcupsd.  I in a x86 stable server which I manage I recently
had the process hald-addon-hid-ups eat up all the memory.  Maybe this version
will fix this.

------- Comment #2 From Andrew Telford 2008-02-06 19:32:08 0000 ------- 
Hal does not like the new hal policy file:

  hald[7429]: error in fdi file
/usr/share/hal/fdi/policy/20thirdparty/80-apcupsd-ups-policy.fdi:5: Bad rule:
unknown type_match

The following mode seems to correct .fdi file syntax. Can someone sanity check
it.  It should probably be fixed upstream.

5c5
<     <match key="info.addons" type="strlist">hald-addon-hid-ups</match>
---
>     <match key="info.addons" contains="hald-addon-hid-ups">


(In reply to comment #1)
> I upgraded to this by renaming the ebuild and files/ patches from 3.14.2
> 
> This version adds an extra file to hal which supposedly fixes contention
> between hal and apcupsd.  I in a x86 stable server which I manage I recently
> had the process hald-addon-hid-ups eat up all the memory.  Maybe this version
> will fix this.
>

------- Comment #3 From Conrad Kostecki 2008-04-29 08:11:44 0000 ------- 
Hope we get this into portage ;)

ebuild works fine in my overlay. just rename. But as already mentioned by
andrew, we need to include this hal patch. i created an diff and patch file.

This patch vrom Andrew will be officially in APCUPSD 3.14.4 released accoring
to http://www.nabble.com/new-hal-policy-file-td15320189.html.

------- Comment #4 From Conrad Kostecki 2008-04-29 08:12:46 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=151301) [details]
apcupsd-3.14.3.ebuild.patch

apcupsd-3.14.3.ebuild.patch

This patch is against apcupsd-3.14.2.ebuild :)

------- Comment #5 From Conrad Kostecki 2008-04-29 08:13:19 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=151302) [details]
files/3.14.3/hal-ups-policy.patch

hal-ups-policy.patch

Patch to fix the new hal file.

------- Comment #6 From Conrad Kostecki 2008-04-29 08:14:48 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=151304) [details]
files/3.14.3/hal-ups-policy.patch

hal-ups-policy.patch

Patch to fix the new hal file.

------- Comment #7 From Michael Imhof 2008-05-08 19:38:29 0000 ------- 
In cvs. Thanks for your help!
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug