Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 200263
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: DUPLICATE of bug 200171
Assigned To: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers <bug-wranglers@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Robert Sebastian Gerus <arachnist@gmail.com>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 200263 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 200263 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2007-11-25 09:10 0000 
Why does emul-linux-x86-qtlibs depend on app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-soundlibs
being built with USE="arts"? A simple one-liner shows that only 1 file from
that package requires arts, and thus that file could simply be removed if
emul-linux-x86-soundlibs isn't built with USE="arts".

for i in $(find ./ -name '*.so.*'); do t=$(ldd "${i}"|grep -i
'artsflow\|libartskde'); [[ ! ${t} = "" ]] && echo ${i} ; done
./usr/kde/3.5/lib32/libartskde.so.1
./usr/kde/3.5/lib32/libartskde.so.1.2.0

And ./usr/kde/3.5/lib32/libartskde.so.1 is a symlink to libartskde.so.1.2.0.

------- Comment #1 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2007-11-25 09:15:30 0000 ------- 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 200171 ***

------- Comment #2 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2007-11-28 11:17:12 0000 ------- 
*** Bug 200624 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #3 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2007-11-28 18:26:30 0000 ------- 
*** Bug 200676 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #4 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2007-12-03 12:47:56 0000 ------- 
*** Bug 201076 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #5 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2007-12-05 19:24:52 0000 ------- 
*** Bug 201374 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #6 From Ákos Maróy 2007-12-06 07:23:21 0000 ------- 
I actually have the problem of being unable to build any of them, because these
two packages seem to be in a circular dependency (see bug 201374 , marked as a
duplicate for this one)

can you guys build either of these libraries in any way?

------- Comment #7 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2007-12-31 01:42:22 0000 ------- 
*** Bug 203845 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug