First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 19261
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers <bug-wranglers@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Pawel Rozanski <tokugawa@wp.pl>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
libsdl-1.2.5-r2.ebuild libsdl-1.2.5-r2 (Update) text/plain Pawel Rozanski 2003-04-13 16:25 0000 3.05 KB Details
libsdl-1.2.5-refreshrates.patch refresh rates patch for SDL text/plain Pawel Rozanski 2003-04-13 16:31 0000 6.44 KB Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 19261 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 19261 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2003-04-13 16:21 0000 
Hi

Xfree 4.3 provides more video modes than previous one, and if you run something
fullscreen SDL choose the 60Hz refresh rate. This ebuild contain a patch (by
Stephen Anthony) which make SDL choose the higest avail refresh rate.

"This functionality can be totally disabled by using the environment 
variable 'SDL_VIDEO_X11_USE_ALL_MODES' set equal to 1."

More info: http://www.libsdl.org/pipermail/sdl/2003-April/053584.html

tokugawa

P.S. My eyes can rest now...

------- Comment #1 From Pawel Rozanski 2003-04-13 16:25:50 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=10591) [details]
libsdl-1.2.5-r2 (Update)

------- Comment #2 From Pawel Rozanski 2003-04-13 16:31:23 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=10592) [details]
refresh rates patch for SDL

------- Comment #3 From Seemant Kulleen (RETIRED) 2003-04-14 03:23:54 0000 ------- 
good job on finding this.  just so you know, I have a bug on xfree86.org open
about restoring the behaviour, or at least making it a runtime
option.http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=148

------- Comment #4 From Pawel Rozanski 2003-04-19 14:16:29 0000 ------- 
Thx, for that link

BTW, I just have known that someone will do "use X && epatch ...", ebuild must be perfect ;)
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug