Bugzilla Bug 18308

webCDwriter can be used to make a single CD-writer available to the users in
your network. It consists of the server CDWserver and the clients webCDcreator
and rcdrecord. CDWserver stores the files transmitted by the clients, reserves
the CD-writer and controls the CD-writer using cdrecord. webCDcreator is a Java
applet that runs within your browser (Netscape, IE, ?), assists you when putting
together a CD and transmits the files.
Finally rcdrecord is a command line client that tries to offer the functionality
of cdrecord over the network (not complete yet). In addition to this there are
several extensions like using MP3s for audio CDs and adding files to a data CD
made easy by the command files2cd.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.




Not sure what happened to my ebuild request but here it is again. There is a new
version of the app out. This app consists of 2 apps a client and a server. We
need ebuilds separate for each so just the client app (rcdrecord) can be
installed on workstations.

The initial ebuild I have for it seems to be corrupt now but I'll attach it
anyway. It has/had xfree86 as a dep and allot of other deps that aren't needed.
I confirmed with the author that X is not required on the server.

Created an attachment (id=9904) [details]
initial ebuild from the gentoo developer that created it (don't remember thier
name and the record in bugzilla is gone)

Created an attachment (id=9905) [details]
initial ebuild from a long time ago. It appears to be corrupt though

I can't attach the file. I let this message:

Status: 400 Bad request (malformed multipart POST)

Actually there are 2 clients. webCDcreator and rcdrecord

ebuild not corrupt - it is just a tar.bz2 file (not at tar.gz). I'm working on
a 2.5.0/2.5.1 version. No idea when/(if?) I'll be finished.

This a carry on from bug http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8017 if I'm not
mistaken.

I'm trying to reduce the number of packages I maintain.
Punting back to bug-wranglers.

*** Bug 8017 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

wrong bug markus

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 8017 ***