Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 1815 - glibc-2.2.5-r2 installs all locales by default
Summary: glibc-2.2.5-r2 installs all locales by default
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 9988
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Development (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Low minor (vote)
Assignee: Martin Schlemmer (RETIRED)
URL: http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.ph...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 1920 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-04-15 18:37 UTC by John White
Modified: 2005-07-17 13:06 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description John White 2002-04-15 18:37:27 UTC
In keeping with the theme of a customized distribution, I suggest that the only
locale that needs to be installed is the locale the user is in.  Vlad and I
worked out a change to the ebuild to install en_US instead of all locales. 
However, I'd suggest a LANG variable or something, which, when set, limits
locale installation to the relevant locale(s).  Default all definitely works for
everyone, and allows for installation without thought or research.  However,
it's bloated and time consuming.
Comment 1 Coran Fisher 2002-04-15 19:45:38 UTC
As a user who switches locales I feel that the ability to have multiple locales
installed is necessary.  Basically I'm trying to say that as long as I have the
option of installing multiple locales then I have no problem with people having
hte ability to install just one locale
Comment 2 John White 2002-04-15 19:56:28 UTC
Well, if you look at the instructions, you'll see that they come at the install
stage, not the locale generation stage.  I have to admit that my knowlege of
this comes from my time with linuxfromscratch.  Essentially, the change I made
to my personal copy of glibc ebuild was to comment out the command to install
all locales, and add a command to install only the en_US locale.  Perhaps a
two-locale user could replace this with two commands to install two locales.  My
question is: does the use of two locales justify the installation of -all- of
them?
Comment 3 Riyad Kalla 2002-04-18 14:47:13 UTC
*** Bug 1920 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Daniel Robbins (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-04-25 01:58:04 UTC
Thilo: let me know if you have a good idea on how to address this issue.
Comment 5 Thilo Bangert (RETIRED) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-06-23 08:32:05 UTC
a whole lot of people have been talking about this and i just realized that 
this one still was hanging around in my buglist - sorry for that. 
 
Comment 6 Rigo 2002-07-10 04:57:02 UTC
Isn't debians localepurge an option ? 

See http://packages.debian.org/unstable/admin/localepurge.html  for more info.
It not only purges unnecessary locales, but manpages as well.








Comment 7 Rigo 2002-08-19 13:35:29 UTC
lappy glibc # localepurge 
localepurge: Disk space freed in /usr/share/locale: 6400K


Thank you ! ;)

Comment 8 Nick "folken" Matthews 2003-04-01 13:28:34 UTC
Has there been any progress made on this bug? I believe it is still relevant. 
Comment 9 Charles Goodwin 2003-10-08 04:40:01 UTC
Is this still relevant?  Doesn't Gentoo use the 2.3.x of glibc these days?
Comment 10 Mr. Bones. (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-10-09 13:48:55 UTC
I don't think the version of glibc is the focus of the bug, rather, the fact
that all locales are installed by default with no clean way of specifying
which
ones are desired.
Comment 11 Heinrich Wendel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-10-12 08:04:26 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 9988 ***