First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 181441
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo KDE team <kde@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfrever@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
kdm-3.5.8-respect-LDFLAGS.patch kdm-3.5.8-respect-LDFLAGS.patch patch Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis 2008-02-13 00:59 0000 587 bytes Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 181441 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 181441 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2007-06-09 17:06 0000 
/var/tmp/portage/kde-base/kdebase-3.5.7/image/usr/kde/3.5/bin/kdm
  [ 3] .hash            HASH           08048188 000188 000510 04   A  5   0  4

------- Comment #1 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2007-06-09 17:07:28 0000 ------- 
Maybe you could elaborate on how did you come to the conclusion that your
LDFLAGS are ignored, which ones are ignored and where's the problem. The above
cryptic stuff unfortunately doesn't explain anything.

------- Comment #2 From Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis 2007-06-09 17:28:18 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #1)
> Maybe you could elaborate on how did you come to the conclusion that your
> LDFLAGS are ignored

Some LDFLAGS can change existence of some sections in ELF files. I have such
(at least) 2 flags in my LDFLAGS and one of them always change existence of
some sections when isn't ignored.
I changed /usr/lib/portage/bin/prepstrip, so that it now additionally runs
readelf and grep and copy the output to the log file.
I perform some tests (reading emerge logs) and >99,5% of results are correct.

> which ones are ignored

All.

> and where's the problem.

Ignoring LDLFAGS increases files sizes and decreases performance.

------- Comment #3 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2007-06-12 17:48:14 0000 ------- 
OK, that was about enough.

1/ Use common sense when filing bugs (like, what about mailing gentoo-dev
mailing list first and asking about the best course of action here?
2/ If you have a patch, submit it *upstream* unless this is a *Gentoo-specific*
issue.

------- Comment #4 From Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis 2008-02-13 00:59:43 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=143375) [details]
kdm-3.5.8-respect-LDFLAGS.patch

------- Comment #5 From Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis 2008-02-13 01:00:11 0000 ------- 
I have attached the patch.

------- Comment #6 From Ingmar Vanhassel (RETIRED) 2008-02-21 13:23:02 0000 ------- 
Fixed in 3.5.9, thanks for the patch.
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug